Thank you! That's a handy technique and it does help. As I understand, there's no way to extend that to multiple lines? One-liners for tests are enough sometimes, but not always. For those cases, it is cumbersome to split as well.
пн, 22 апр. 2019 г. в 22:51, Berry, Charles <ccbe...@ucsd.edu>: > It looks like you want the :epilogue header argument. See inline. > > > On Apr 22, 2019, at 2:00 AM, Dmitrii Korobeinikov <dim12...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > When I write several source blocks, which depend on one another, I tend > to debug them one by one. > > > > So, I write this function and test it: > > > > #+NAME: square > > #+BEGIN_SRC python > > square = lambda x: x * x > > return square(5) > > #+END_SRC > > > > #+RESULTS: square > > : 25 > > > > > Equivalently, you could run this: > > #+NAME: square > #+BEGIN_SRC python :epilogue return square(5) > square = lambda x: x * x > #+END_SRC > > > > > After I see that the test is successful, I write this client function: > > > > #+BEGIN_SRC python :noweb yes > > <<square>> > > return 5 + square(5) > > #+END_SRC > > > > #+RESULTS: > > : 25 > > > > And here, to get the correct result, I have to remove the ~return > square(5)~ line in ~<<square>>~. > > But I don't want to lose testing! > > S > > With my version of `square`, the epilogue is not included. > > So it works as you want it to. > > HTH, > > Chuck > > >
