I tried the Org mode from the Org mode ELPA (org-20181112.tar) but
apparently the bug fix is not in there yet. But I also tried the one from
the latest Git and it's fixed in there. Thanks very much. --Omari
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:24 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Omari Norman <om...@smileystation.com> writes:
>
> > I am having a problem with group tags. I reproduced it using the latest
> > org-mode from the org package archive, 20181022. The minimal example is
> > this: say I have a group tag that looks like this:
> >
> > (setq org-tag-alist
> > '((:startgrouptag)
> > ("parentTag")
> > (:grouptags)
> > ("childTag1")
> > ("childTag2")
> > (:endgrouptag)))
> >
> > with a org-todo-keywords like so:
> >
> > (setq org-todo-keywords '((type "TODO" "NEXT" "|" "DONE" "CANCELLED")))
> >
> > And then an org file that looks like this:
> >
> > * Parent heading 1 :childTag1:
> > ** NEXT child 1 of parent 1
> > ** TODO child 2 of parent 1
> >
> > * Parent heading 2
> > ** NEXT child 1 of parent 2
> > ** TODO child 2 of parent 2
> >
> > Then when I hit C-c a M, I use this match string:
> >
> > parentTag&TODO="NEXT"|-parentTag&TODO="TODO"
> >
> > I would expect the resulting agenda to have exactly two items: "child 1
> of
> > parent 1", and "child 2 of parent 2". However, I get three items:
> "child 1
> > of parent 1", "child 2 of parent 1", and "child 2 of parent 2". I don't
> > understand why "child 2 of parent 1" is in there.
> >
> > This only arises when using the "|" operator. That is, if I do an agenda
> > with just
> >
> > parentTag&TODO="NEXT"
> >
> > then I get just "child 1 of parent 1", as expected. If I do an agenda
> with
> >
> > -parentTag&TODO="TODO"
> >
> > then I get just "child 2 of parent 2", as expected. But when I combine
> > them with "|", I get three items.
> >
> > I also did some other tests showing that at least for me this problem
> > arises only with group tags. In particular, here if I do
> >
> > childTag1&TODO="NEXT"|-childTag1&TODO="TODO"
> >
> > I get just the two items I would expect.
> >
> > Is there a bug here? Or am I doing something wrong?
>
> It was a bug, now hopefully fixed.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
