I also support the idea of keeping "<s" as it was. Please give importance to the backward compatibility in this case.
Best regards, Takaaki Ishikawa 2017-11-09 3:24 GMT+09:00 Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com>: > > Berry, Charles writes: > >>> On Nov 8, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: >>> >>> I think the template expansion a la "<s" is brilliant. I used to have >>> YASnippet installed for many years, and I never figured out how to use it >>> properly. To me, it is a bit too complex a replacement. >> >> >> Me too. "<s" just works. And it is brutally easy to extend. >> >> I suspect that there will be cries of pain and anger from others who have >> not tuned in to this thread if it is removed. >> >> Chuck > > Agreed. It would be great if backward compatibility could be > maintained. I use (org-try-structure-completion) all the time. > > All the best, > Tom > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com >
