Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > I'm still not quite seeing this. This chunk should take care of it: > > (goto-char e) > (if (bolp) > (progn > (skip-chars-backward " \n\t") > (forward-line)) > (end-of-line) > (insert "\n")) > > If "e" is EOB, we do `end-of-line' and insert a newline, it should be > taken care of. I added a new clause in the test for this case, and it > seems to work fine... Am I missing anything?
I don't think so. It looks correct, indeed. However, you sent the wrong patch. Could you send the updated patch again? Thank you. Regards,
