Hello, Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> writes:
> If you would prefer the &rest approach, that would mean doing the actual > insertion into the agenda buffer in the macro call rather than the macro > expansion. I thought it would be better to separate the actual > insertion by abstracting it behind the macro. I don't understand. There no difference of evaluation between (default) and (&rest default). Anyway, I'm fine with a single S-exp in the macro. See may comments about the patches. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
