Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: > I was writing something along the lines of this when I needed to specify > the n macro to hold its previous value and not increment at all.
[...] > I haven't yet created a proper formatted patch, because I don't know if > this is the best implementation. Would it be better to rename the RESET > option to something more generic, like ARG? That way, > > - If ARG is a "-" string, the counter value will be held and not > incremented. > - If ARG is a number represented as a string, it set the NAME counter to > that value (like now). > - Else if ARG is a non-empty string, it resets the NAME counter to 1 (like > now). I think it is better since resetting, setting and holding are mutually exclusive. With tests, please! :) Regards,
