Michael Welle <mwe012...@gmx.net> writes: > Hello, > > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Michael Welle <mwe012...@gmx.net> writes: >> >>> Even if we assume its quality is high enough to integrate it into Org, >> >> If code quality was a concern, Org would still be in alpha release ;) > thank you for your kind words, Nicolas ;). > > >>> there might or might not be another problem: I haven't signed the FSF >>> papers. I would like to see the functionality in Org, too. Perhaps >>> someone can sneak it in ;). I can repost the code, stating that it is >>> licensed under the GPL or is even in the public domain, if that helps. >> >> I don't think it helps. IIRC, code integration in Emacs is pretty >> strict. You could simply sign FSF papers. > Yes. Trouble is nobody could explain to me what I have to sign and what > that means in the legal system I'm in. My last attempt to find that out > was in #emacs. It's about 'transfer of copyright' to the FSF. If I > translate 'copyright' to the corresponding construct in our legal > system, the transfer isn't possible. I can't give away the copyright. > Maybe 'transfer of copyright' isn't what signing the FSF papers mean, I > don't know. And IANAL ;).
You might want to discuss this with the FSF copyright clerk copyright-cl...@fsf.org They will also be able to tell you if you can use e.g. the FSFE assignments. Rasmus -- The second rule of Fight Club is: You do not talk about Fight Club