On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > Colin Baxter <m43...@yandex.com> writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >>> >>>> What is the failure in each case? >>> >> ---- snip ---- >> >> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+0000) >> 8 expected failures >> >> org-mode release_9.0.5-282-g2e32709 >> emacs-25.1.1; 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.84-1 i686 GNU/Linux >> >> > > It might be that emacs 26 shows the failures (both Marco Wahl and I are > running that, but Colin Baxter runs emacs 25 and does not see them).
Unfortunately, the tests pass using emacs-26 too: Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 21:21:38+0000) 8 expected failures org-version: 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-288-g4caad0) GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2017-02-11 Best wishes, Colin.
