Hi Bastien, Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes:
> Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes: > >> Kaushal Modi <kaushal.m...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Kyle -- Would this be a good time to start the merge to emacs master? >> >>>From my standpoint, that'd be fine. I'm not aware of any outstanding >> patches that need to be backported from the Emacs repo. > > Before undertaking this, we need to make sure the Emacs maintainers > are fine with it -- I'm late in reading the related discussions. > > Can you wait a few days for my "go" ? I'll do better than that and wait indefinitely since the plan isn't for me to do the syncing :) To give a bit more context to Kaushal's question, when he asked the list previously [*1*] about syncing 9.0.4 with the Emacs repo, I replied [*2*, *3*] that we should wait for the next release because there were Emacs commits that still needed to be backported, as well as white space touch-ups that were needed in order for the Org files to pass Emacs's pre-commit check. I also mentioned [*2*] that I had created a branch, emacs-sync, in the Org repo that contains a few extra changes that I think are appropriate for the sync. That branch is up-to-date with 9.0.5. [*1*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-01/msg00551.html [*2*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-01/msg00571.html [*3*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-01/msg00584.html -- Kyle
