>>>>> "DE" == David Engster <d...@randomsample.de> writes:
DE> I find this whole core vs package argument strange. If you ship Emacs with DE> Org, Gnus and CEDET, they are part of Emacs, so it's in the interest of DE> all Emacs developers that they work well, whether they use them or not. DE> The users won't care if they originate from a separate repo and are DE> considered a "package". So if Paul is determined to fix all occurences of DE> "compatilibity" in the doc-strings, why would he only do that for core? If pulling Emacs.git also pulls ELPA.git (as it should, since it's within our purview as well), then global search&replace should still affect all the files. I hear your other points, so I'm curious now as to what more people think about this who work on Emacs core: Do you want more modularity with regard ELPA, or does the monolithic model work better for you? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
