> This is a contributed package. I don't mind patching it but those have, > usually, a maintainer.
Is there some other maintainer I should contact? I mean, should I be posting bug reports and patches to contributed packages on some other mailing list? > Are you sure it is a bug? There's a comment about it in > `org-rss-headline' so maybe it is intended. The comment says "Only consider first level headlines". I took that to mean that only first level headlines will become individual RSS items, but that all contents under that first level headline will be included into the corresponding RSS item. Therefore, I concluded that dropping lower level headlines was a bug. But, even if it isn't a bug, I think it makes more sense to include all content within the first level headline in the RSS item. I don't see a use case where you would want to drop lower level headlines. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > Also, isn't the output of `org-html-headline' > (`org-export-data-with-backend' is better IMO) a bit verbose? You are > going to insert <div id="outline-container-..." ...>"... I'm not sure what you mean by verbose. The RSS specification does allow HTML within a CDATA section. Besides, org-export-data-with-backend (with the html backend) also inserts the "<div id="outline-container-..." ...>" things, doesn't it?
