Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes: > Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > >> On Thursday, 8 Oct 2015 at 19:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> I think I will go with the straight to the point >>> `org-export-barf-on-invalid-link' variable. >>> >>> However, not sure about the OPTIONS item. >>> >>> #+OPTIONS: ???:t >> >> #+options: barf:t >> >> ;-) >> >> More seriously, I'm a big fan of longer is better if more clear so how >> about "invalidlinksok:t" or "allowdanglinglinks:t" or some variation >> thereof? > > Can option names contain dashes? > If so, combine these two ideas to make a name as similar as possible > to the variable name: > > #+options: barf-on-invalid-link:t
While I agree that options such as 't:·', '^:·', 'h:·' are bad, I think 'barf:·' is nice. It's short and precise, much like 'num:·'. Something like 'barf-on-invalid-link' is very easy to mistype or forget. And yes, I mostly type options by hand. Rasmus -- Got mashed potatoes. Ain't got no T-Bone. No T-Bone
