I thought as much. Thanks for the help.
I have installed the code for the number sequencing which is a bigger headache than the cumulative grade. I never thought that field code can be
used along with column code. Interesting info.
By the way using a spreadsheet is not as efficient for me as using orgmode and orgmode is much more fun. Having discovered this list, there are
so many treasures that I am finding in the archives. Glad to be here.
Juri Krivov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Kene Meniru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Thanks to everyone who helped me with the letter grading and ranking
formula for columns 17/Q and 18/R above. I wish to trouble you all
again with two requests. After incorporating the two solutions above
and entering my summer class grades, it was so sweet that I would
like two other things automated.
| | | Total grades for | 100 | 100 | 89 | 84 | 100 |
100 | 204 | 400 | 100 | 100 | | | | | |
|
| ^ | | each evaluation | DG | EG | FG | GG | HG |
IG | JG | KG | LG | MG | Single | Overall | Overall | | |
|
| | | Percentage weights | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 7 |
7 | 14 | 12 | 0 | 24 | Now | Now | Final | | | |
| ^ | SQ | Student Names | E01 | E02 | E03 | E04 | E05 |
E06 | E07 | E08 | E09 | E10 | E-Grade | C-Grade | F-Grade | L | RK |
SQ |
|---+----+--------------------+-------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---------+---------+---------+---+----+----|
| # | 1 | lastA, first | 95.23 | 87.7 | 76 | 75 | 100 |
100 | 204 | | | | 0.00 | 93.67 | 59.95 | A | 1 |
1 |
| # | 2 | lastB, first | 100 | 64.7 | 61 | 63 | 100 |
60 | 204 | | | | 0.00 | 81.29 | 52.02 | B | 4 |
2 |
| # | 3 | lastC, first | 85.69 | 60.2 | 66 | 68 | 100 |
90 | 130 | | | | 0.00 | 76.40 | 48.89 | C | 7 |
3 |
| # | 4 | lastD, first | 76.15 | 44.6 | 41 | 54 | 100 |
100 | 85 | | | | 0.00 | 62.34 | 39.90 | D | 10 |
4 |
| # | 5 | lastE, first | 80.92 | 43.6 | 68 | 63 | 100 |
70 | 173 | | | | 0.00 | 75.20 | 48.13 | C | 8 |
5 |
| # | 6 | lastF, first | 85.69 | 80.4 | 50.5 | 42 | 100 |
100 | 196 | | | | 0.00 | 80.17 | 51.31 | B | 5 |
6 |
| # | 7 | lastG, first | 95.23 | 56.6 | 55 | 65 | 100 |
60 | 157 | | | | 0.00 | 73.85 | 47.27 | C | 9 |
7 |
| # | 8 | lastH, first | 80.92 | 50.7 | 64 | 70 | 100 |
90 | 159 | | | | 0.00 | 77.60 | 49.66 | C | 6 |
8 |
| # | 9 | lastI, first | 95.23 | 73.2 | 88 | 73 | 100 |
70 | 183 | | | | 0.00 | 87.61 | 56.07 | B | 2 |
9 |
| # | 10 | lastJ, first | 85.69 | 47.2 | 28 | | 100 |
0 | | | | | 0.00 | 31.26 | 20.01 | F | 11 | 10 |
| # | 11 | lastK, first | 100 | 69 | 56 | 77 | 100 |
100 | 164 | | | | 0.00 | 83.77 | 53.61 | B | 3 |
11 |
|---+----+--------------------+-------+------+------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---------+---------+---------+---+----+----|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
#+TBLFM:
$14=($13/$MG)*100;%.2f::$15=(((($E01/$DG)*$4)+(($E02/$EG)*$5)+(($E03/$FG)*$6)+(($E04/$GG)*$7)+(($E05/$HG)*$8)+(($E06/$IG)*$9)+(($E07/$JG)*$10))/($E01+$E02+$E03+$E04+$E05+$E06+$E07))*100;%.2f::$16=((($E01/$DG)*$4)+(($E02/$EG)*$5)+(($E03/$FG)*$6)+(($E04/$GG)*$7)+(($E05/$HG)*$8)+(($E06/$IG)*$9)+(($E07/$JG)*$10)+(($E08/$KG)*$11)+(($E09/$LG)*$12)+(($E10/$MG)*$13);%.2f::$17=if($15<60,F,if($15<70,D,if($15<80,C,if($15<90,B,A))))::$18=find(rsort(@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]),$15)::$19=$2
First is the cumulative grade column 15/O.
Presently, I add the available grades divided by the available
total. When I grade each additional assignment, I add that to the
total in this column's formula manually which gives me the
cumulative. Is there a way to automatically do this or am I
expecting too much? I have removed grades in column K, L, M so I can
show the difference in calculation between column O and P. Assuming
there are 10 assessments for the class in the semester and 7 have
been graded. Column O shows the grade for each student as 100% of
the total grade. Column P shows the appropriate fraction of the
total grade for the assessments as a fraction of the overall knowing
that there are 3 more assignments ungraded. Column O gives me a
better snapshot of each students performance at any point in time.
To do automatically it seems quite hard, even in real spreadheet
programs it require many if structures, checking if field is empty or
no. Maybe you make extra copy row with "percentage weights", but make
zero weights of assignments not yet done, and use new weight row for
column 15? Then you put new weight in new row to make assignment active
for "cumulative grade"?
The second problem is numbering the students in column 2/B.
I want to manage the number for each student so that it does not
matter when I add or remove a student in the roster. Right now
students are registering for the fall classes and I add their names
according to their alphabetized last names. I have to re-sequence
this column constantly. I appreciate all the help that anyone can
throw at these problems.
This I do by using field formula for first field, then column formula
for rest:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]::@5$2=1
Juri
--
Kene Meniru
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
