Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here is the only slight oddity I've found so far: when moving folded > trees, sometimes the moved tree will be swallowed in the previous or > next fold...
More on this: I think this is due to the fact that any empty line at the end of a subtree is considered to be part of the *next* subtree... Maybe it is reasonable to consider that any subtree ends with a minimum of 1 empty line? I guess this would solve the problem of wrongly folded subtrees... -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
