Austin Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't yet investigated the templating options mentioned here > (though dmacro sounds like it's got potential). Still, I wonder if a) > the feature already exists, or b) other people would be interested in > seeing it included in a future version of Org.
I think templates are too much based on the way one works. I can't imagine one template turning out to be the default template for Org, since the "default template" is just a scratch buffer. For example, i've been using the one-project-per-file setup you've described for a while. It first matches my taste for playing with options that made each file aware of the context in which i was using it. But after some time i (somewhat sadly) discovered my taste didn't match my actual needs and switch back to the one-single-big-file setup, since it does constrain a very sober (and hopefully more efficient) use of metadata and options. But of course this is my story, and everyone uses Org for different needs, with different tastes. I can see one constructive way of providing templates for org-mode: to post them on a dedicated page of the emacswiki, along with discussions on how/why to use them, or how a template matches a specific use. And maybe the further step would be to provide a package with all the templates. Best, -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
