-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> I have never even once in my lifetime applied two different styles to
> a piece of text. What is the application of this?
Looking through a few O'Reilly books on my shelf, I see that different
books use constant-width bold (<b><pre>text</pre></b>) and
constant-width italics (<i><pre>text</pre></i>) to indicate where a user
should enter input in example code.
I've been writing a tutorial for use in my lab, and have wanted the
ability to typographically distinguish between optional and required
parts of our in-house scripting language. I'd like to say
All *bold* terms are properties of a certain part. All
/*italic bold*/ terms are required properties of that part.
I don't know if this request is common enough to warrant inclusion, or
how much of a pain it would be to add to the parser, but that's the
first example off the top of my head of where I'd use this kind of
formatting.
Thanks,
/au
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEhZdVlHMl2/XbR4ERAh7AAKCexPBqwT5cXTmeeIv0GeiIT7dx8gCgtF5p
ODgsAQccvx72clftxlD3J3s=
=lRQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
