My colleague has done some excellent work in this direction in iterex: hexdocs.pm/iterex

On Dec 18, 2024, at 1:22 AM, José Valim <jose.va...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you for the proposal. In the best case scenario, it would be premature to do any improvement on this area before the type system is in place.

At the same time, it is worth noting that the libraries you mentioned could reach a consensus on a shared interface, without us having to pick something and force it downstream. In other words, the addition of the feature needs to be justified on its own merit: using the language to unify libraries can be a positive, but it should not be the root cause. More information on the features we consider can be found here: 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2BsDHHq5ewW6DpHXTp0LEV%2BJznJczKze0YFd44HEN3Mgg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/324E6458-8C0E-4C9E-9217-5DEE7922548F%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to