Running `mix format --check-formatted` passes with success on the following
code:
defmodule Example do
@xs [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7
]
@other [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7
]
|> Enum.map(&(&1 * 2))
|> Enum.reject(&(&1 < 5))
|> length()
@words ~w(
ONE
TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
)
|> Enum.filter(&String.contains?(&1, "F"))
end
I am wondering whether that is intended or if I should open an issue on
Github and look into fixing it.
`@words` does not seem to be formatted in the same way as `@other` which I
would kinda expect and the formatting of `@words` looks kinda weird.
Secondly is there reason why when I pipe the module attribute that it gets
intended differently than when I do not pipe it (compare @other with @xs)?
Best regards,
Dario
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/a1d30a3c-8fea-46f3-a688-71a83f9bd7adn%40googlegroups.com.
