That sounds OK to me, as we can implement it on top of Access.fetch. :) PR is welcome.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:13 AM Tyler Young <[email protected]> wrote: > There's been advice <https://keathley.io/blog/good-and-bad-elixir.html> in > the community to avoid unnecessarily locking yourself into a particular > data structure by using Access.get/2 rather the Map or Keyword versions > of get/2. > > In line with that, it would be nice if there were a corresponding > Access.get_lazy/3. Obviously this wouldn't be available in the shorthand > get syntax (my_container[:my_key]), but I think it'd be useful > nonetheless. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "elixir-lang-core" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/50dae814-c49c-43e1-8447-6b4a35bfcf96n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/50dae814-c49c-43e1-8447-6b4a35bfcf96n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2BDT3fAQm9Dgxr0Smn0k6WUReRAdDhUr9b7qqOPAc7eYw%40mail.gmail.com.
