The proposal has been updated in the gist <https://gist.github.com/josevalim/da8f1630e5f515dc2b05aefdc5d01af7> for: x..y//z.
> Since we're bike shedding on the syntax, I would throw my hat into the > ring for > 1..10:2 > It was commented before but the syntax above is ambiguous due to the use of atoms and keywords, for example: x..y:z. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4K_%2B85sk7Uv-LGV1WWOd%3DGDaCp0MW8mXj208aC9cTU%2BHg%40mail.gmail.com.
