Hi Anton, > +#define NAME_MAX_SIZE (32 * 17 + 32 + 1) > +static_assert(NAME_MAX_SIZE == (32 * 17 + 32 + 1), "Buffer size for 'name' > is insufficient");
This is indeed a static_assert. But doesn't really add any value. It just checks the calculation one line above. But doesn't explain or check why that calculation is "correct". Is there a way to better work together. We have seen various RASU JSC "fixes" but it isn't really clear what those are or why you want to fix these issues. What exactly is RASU JSC? Why do you believe the issues it finds should be "fixed"? Reviewing these patches costs real time and energy. So it would be good to understand what the goal of these patches is. It feels a lot of the suggested fixes introduce new (other) issues. Thanks, Mark
