Hi Michael, On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 03:10:16PM +0000, Michael Pratt wrote: > > If we are trying to be more consistent then I think I would prefer we > > use putchar, puts, and printf, instead of adding stdout to all these > > calls. > > I don't really have a preference, you could even throw out this last patch. > I just thought it would be nice to remove use of one of the functions > from the whole project to reduce needless variations and save the need to link > more functions that do the exact same thing and waste binary space. > > Also, that searching "puts" results in "outputs" and "inputs"... > > It would be nice to have patch 5 before release, > for patch 6 doesn't matter if or when to me. > > Let me know if you want a v2 of either patch 5 or 6.
Lets postpone the consistency/renaming patch to after the release. If you could simplify patch 5 by just changing the putprint_unlocked functions to their putprint variant that would be appreciated. Thanks, Mark
