Hi Aaron,

I update and do make check, the results are OK.

Thanks for your timely modification.

Ying

在 2024/7/12 23:38, Aaron Merey 写道:
> Hi Ying,
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 2:06 PM Aaron Merey <ame...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 4:33 AM Ying Huang <ying.hu...@oss.cipunited.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> + testrun diff /tmp/tmp.bCCbATKu43/stack.out -
>>> + built_testrun diff /tmp/tmp.bCCbATKu43/stack.out -
>>> + 
>>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/huangying/elf/elfutils_main/libdw:/home/huangying/elf/elfutils_main/backends:/home/huangying/elf/elfutils_main/libelf:/home/huangying/elf/elfutils_main/libasm:/home/huangying/elf/elfutils_main/debuginfod
>>> + diff /tmp/tmp.bCCbATKu43/stack.out -
>>> 4,5c4,5
>>> < #1  0x0000aaaae5663f20
>>> < #2  0x0000aaaae5667a98
>>> ---
>>>> #1  0x0000aaaae5663f20 kill_shell
>>>> #2  0x0000aaaae5667a98 termsig_handler.part.0
>>> + rm -rf -- /tmp/tmp.bCCbATKu43
>>> FAIL run-sysroot.sh (exit status: 1)
>>>
>>>
>>> There are two lines where the function name cannot be parsed.
>> I took a look at this but I'm still not sure what's going on.  I ran
>> the run-sysroot.sh testcase by hand on the extracted contents of
>> testfile-sysroot.tar.bz2.  eu-stack's /proc/PID/fd contained the
>> correct binaries located under the sysroot.  The testcase passes
>> on my Fedora 40 x86_64 machine as well as on all elfutils buildbots.
>>
>> It's also strange that those two particular stack frames from
>> /bin/bash are missing the function name yet the other /bin/bash
>> frames include proper function names.
>>
>> I'll look into this some more.
> This issue turned out to be related to .gnu_debugdata.  The 2 missing
> symbols you reported are contained in this section.  It's LZMA-compressed
> so if elfutils isn't built with LZMA support then the section isn't read.
>
> I did some testing on Debian 6.1.94-1 (2024-06-21) x86_64. LZMA/xz wasn't
> pre-installed and I was able to reproduce the test failure.  I pushed a
> commit (39e962f063b5e) that modifies run-sysroot.sh to remove these two
> frames from the backtrace being tested, so that the result doesn't depend
> on LZMA support.
>
> Aaron
>

Reply via email to