On Wed, 26 May 2021 12:41:51 -0300 Érico Nogueira <eric...@disroot.org> wrote:
> > Yes, we really cross. It doesn't matter because > We always use the release tarballs, which already have the %_dis.h > files. This explains why we haven't hit any issues. > Anyway, couldn't you (re)use the distribution tarball generation stuff > for cross setups from git master? I can. But I haven't problems with building it "directly from VCS" too, as you see. Nevertheless there are opinion that code from VCS could be smoothly building without procedures behind scene. > Otherwise this would add a > dependency on autoconf-archive for anyone generating the configure > script locally... Well, anyone who generate configure locally has it. Otherwise it is a big pain ;). > I think a final version of this patch should > document the autoconf-archive requirement, if it's merged. May be addition of m4/ax_prog_cc_for_build.m4 make sense? Best regards, -- - ptr
