Hi,

On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 04:15 +0000, build...@builder.wildebeest.org
wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder whole buildset
> while building elfutils.
> Full details are available at:
>     https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/4/builds/640
> 
> Buildbot URL: https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/
> 
> Worker for this Build: debian-i386
> 
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder
> whole buildset while building elfutils.
> Full details are available at:
>     https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/15/builds/436
> 
> Buildbot URL: https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/
> 
> Worker for this Build: debian-armhf

That is interesting, it only fails on the two 32bit systems.
The failure is about the specific error message returned.

FAIL: run-dwflsyms.sh
=====================
--- dwflsyms.out        2020-11-28 01:17:44.130295202 +0000
+++ -   2020-11-28 01:17:44.140327188 +0000
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
    9: NOTYPE   GLOBAL  __kernel_sigtramp_rt64 (12) 0xfffb1af0418
   10: NOTYPE   GLOBAL  __kernel_clock_gettime (152) 0xfffb1af0494
   11: NOTYPE   GLOBAL  __kernel_get_syscall_map (44) 0xfffb1af05f4
-ld64.so.1: No symbol table found
+ld64.so.1: Callback returned failure
    0: NOTYPE   LOCAL    (0) 0
    1: SECTION  LOCAL    (0) 0x461b0190
    2: SECTION  LOCAL    (0) 0x461b01a4
FAIL run-dwflsyms.sh (exit status: 1)

So there is some subtle difference in the behavior of the
'segment_report_module: Inline consider_notes() into only caller'
patch.

I haven't spotted it yet, but I suspect some 'return' from the original
function got mistranslated as a continue, break or goto out in the
inlined variant.

The specific testcase that fails is:
testrun_compare ${abs_builddir}/dwflsyms -e testfile66 --core=testfile66.core

Which is a big endian ppc64 executable and core file.

Cheers,

Mark

Reply via email to