Hi Dmitry, On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 02:25 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:09:32PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Even if you could use libasm.h, linking with libasm always was kind > > of > > useless since there was no supported way to create an Ebl handle. > > Unless you statically linked with libebl, which was never supported and > > might still not work since it might conflict with changes in the libebl > > linked to by libasm/libdw. > > > > In fact our own elfutils.spec doesn't even install it. But sadly some > > distros (including Fedora... my fault) do install it. > > > > Short term I propose the attached patch. > > Thanks, it works: the packaging check that used to complain about > compilation error in installed libasm.h turns green when this patch > is applied.
Great. I pushed it to master. Thanks, Mark
