LPP> The only major problem with it is that the Postmodern backend
LPP> hasn't kept up with the schema evolution changes.
hm, what do you mean? i thought it works reasonably well, as there
are just a handful of glitches to left resolve, but i won't call that "a
major problem".
or am i missing something?
i've just updated repo elephant-unstable and ran tests with postmodern
(i have few local changes but i don't think they make difference):
Did 462 checks.
Pass: 460 (99%)
Skip: 1 ( 0%)
Fail: 1 ( 0%)
Failure Details:
--------------------------------
SIMPLE-EXPLICIT-ASSOC-SETUP []:
Unexpected Error: #<SIMPLE-ERROR {C177871}>
There is no class named PJASSOC...
--------------------------------
Skip Details:
SIMPLE-EXPLICIT-ASSOC []:
Dependencies not satisfied.
actually it seems to be quite chaotic -- i have different set of errors
each time i run a test suite. but i guess that is either a problem
with tests or a problem with my SBCL, because i also get problems
with BDB backend.
heh, running it one more time left no errors:
Did 462 checks.
Pass: 462 (100%)
Skip: 0 ( 0%)
Fail: 0 ( 0%)
really there's some BS with tests..
LPP> There were still some deca of failing tests when I last tried
LPP> it.
and no problems with BDB and CLSQL, if you run it on a clean DB,
and afterwards on less clean?
LPP> Maybe it makes sense to have two releases: 091.1 for all
LPP> who wish to use Postmodern (a snapshot of the current stable)
LPP> and 092 for all who are content with CLSQL or BDB.
yep, as for me that makes sense..
_______________________________________________
elephant-devel site list
elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
