On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 18:37 -0500, Ian Eslick wrote: > I'm surprised you are seeing this difference on Postmodern, unless > your input name is matching a large number of objects (i.e. s is > large). I had thought that the native PostgreSQL backend, > postmodern, > fixed the linear cost problem of CL-SQL indices and provides the > same > O(s) performance that BDB does, but I'm not certain (Henrik? > Robert?). It sounds like you are seeing a high linear cost.
Postmodern does exactly the same thing that CL-SQL does in this respect; the code was copied directly from the CL-SQL code. _______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
