I am surprised to hear that darcs didn't work on windows. It must work for some people though, there is even a GUI browser for darcs on windows: http://tortoisedarcs.sourceforge.net/
I think someone (possibly PG) wrote he had never heard of anyone knowing Common Lisp well switching to Java unless forced to. Likewise I have never heard of someone knowing darcs switching to cvs or subversion. However, there has been at least one person knowing darcs well that switched to Mercurial. http://changelog.complete.org/posts/588-Re-Examining-Darcs-Mercurial.html So being a big darcs fan, if for some reason darcs is not choosen, I also give my second vote to Mercurial. /Henrik On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 02:15 +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Robert L. Read dies 25/03/2007 hora 13:27: > > Obviously, if darcs doesn't work well with Windows, that is not a > > point in its favor. > > As I said, if eventually you don't decide to use darcs, but wish to use > a DCVS, I strongly recommend Mercurial. It seems to work nicely on > Windows, has a clean and well-documented interface and very good > performance. > > Quickly, > Pierre > _______________________________________________ > elephant-devel site list > elephant-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel _______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
