+1 On Jul 9, 2013 12:03 AM, "Conscious User" <consciousu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Erm... I'm not sure how to answer this. None of > your replies seem to be relevant or even directly > related to what I said. > > > Em Seg, 2013-07-08 às 23:27 -0500, Cody Garver escreveu: > > If anyone is an opponent of GNOME tech right now it's proprietary > > video driver developers. Those are concrete issues that affect any > > non-Intel GPU user. I haven't seen any hostility from Ubuntu. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Cody Garver <c...@elementaryos.org> > > wrote: > > My sentence ran out of fuel there. PPAs are immensely valuable > > and eclipse any popular sentiment right now. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Cody Garver > > <c...@elementaryos.org> wrote: > > PPAs. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Conscious User > > <consciousu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Some time ago, I have noticed that an app I'm > > developing had > > some rendering issues only when the Ubuntu > > overlay scrollbars > > were being used. When I took this to Ubuntu > > developers, I was > > told that my best chance was to patch the > > scrollbars myself > > because no one was currently working on them. > > > > This is a symptom of something that, for > > anyone who's been > > following the Ubuntu developer community, > > should be quite > > evident at this point: due to the move to QML > > and touch, GTK > > and the rest of the stack Ubuntu had been > > using will now be > > second-class citizens, and it is only a matter > > of time before > > this change of status starts to gradually > > creep into overall > > stability and speed of fixing bugs. > > > > This wouldn't be much of a problem if Ubuntu > > simply packaged > > and shipped a vanilla GNOME stack, but the > > problem is that > > they ship a patched stack mixed with > > unpolished Ayatana > > projects which might now never get any more > > polish. And this > > might get worse with the move to Mir, as > > Canonical will probably > > need to add and maintain Mir support to GTK by > > itself. > > > > My intention here is not to question any > > direction Canonical > > is taking, but to question how much it still > > makes sense to > > build elementary on top of Ubuntu instead of a > > distro that > > uses a more vanilla GNOME stack or at least > > one that still > > treats it as a first-class citizen. > > > > It might be a good time to have a serious > > discussion on this. > > > > > > > > -- > > Mailing list: > > https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > > Post to : > > elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : > > https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > > More help : > > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cody Garver > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cody Garver > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cody Garver > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
