It is nice and low but 1 dB is not exactly cutting edge. I will measure mine when it arrives on some high spec equipment. It does not really matter that mush though on 2m. For terrestrial use the band noise is the limit, for EME anyone serious will be using a low noise pre-amplifier.
What is much more important to operational use and what I would like to know is the dynamic range. Is it over 100 dB at 3kHz spacing like the K3 on HF? What about the intercept point - is it better than 20 dBm? It needs to be here in Europe! There are 4 high power stations active in my grid square, i.e IO91JO and blocking is an issue with the XV144/K3 combo. Mike Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: > > A correction to our initial spec's on the K144XV 2M module for theK3. > There was a miscalculation of its Noise Figure when we came up with the > initial data. > > We've tested a number of K144XVs now and have found that they are > typically measuring at 1 dB NF, not the 2 dB NF as earlier stated. :-) > > 73 Eric WA6HHQ > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/K144XV-for-K3-NF-%3D-1dB-tp3463013p3468240.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
