This is amazing....We have some who complain about NR increasing the audio and some complaining about it reducing audio! I think the K3's NR is the best I've seen thus far. Contrary to some "experts" opinion, it works great with narrow cw filters and not only reduces noise but "Peaks" the CW signals. Someone said it makes CW "mushy". I say it does just exactly the opposite. It sharpens the AF response and enhances CW, especially weak signals that are down at the noise floor. Have had a lot of rigs, the IC-7800's NR is pretty good too. The PRO series NR is terrible. Keep in mind I'm talking about CW here. Keep that AGC threshold up high and the SLP low....It makes the NR really bring up those CW signals nice and LOUD like they should be. N4LQ Steve Ellington [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deni" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:18 PM Subject: [Elecraft] NB/NR Noise Blanker/ Noise reduction
> Yes let's not get this confused... the K3 NB (Noise Blanker) does a > great job with impulse noise from my local electric fence QRM. > > However, the NR (Noise reduction) always seems to reduce the audio and > does very little to enhance the recovered audio. > > This is my subjective opinion. > -- > 73, Deni > F5VJC > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[email protected] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
