Hi Greg, If you search the list archives, you'll find all kinds of info for this.
I put my KPA100 and KAT100 in an EC2 last fall and find it to be a really slick setup. Lyle, KK7P has a nice webpage full of pics and details for doing the split: http://www.kk7p.com/k2kpa100.html To answer your questions: > 1. Whether the KPA100 behaves (i.e., "appears") the same to the K2 as > if it were internal? Yes. As long as the AuxBus connection exists. > 2. Is it a simple plug-n-play to either use or not use the EC2 setup? I assume you mean pulling the "basic" K2 out of the setup for portable/separate use - Yes. Unplug the RF connections and AuxBus cable and your ready to go. > 3. For QPR ops with the EC2 setup, can you run just the KAT100 without > having to power the KPA100? The KPA100 will still have "minimal" power applied. It will be in bypass mode when you turn the power pot down below 10 watts. And yes the KAT100 is still active. (This is the case whether the KPA100 is separated or not). I put the KIO2, KAT2 and KB2 in my basic K2 when I split the KPA100 out. Having a KIO2 installed makes the split very clean and easy. Although, you can do the split without the KIO2 - Lyle describes that in detail. His description using the KIO2 can be found toward the bottom of that page. Hope this answers your questions. Dave W8FGU > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:elecraft- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Derda > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Elecraft] K2/KPA100 vs. EC2/KPA100 > > Hi all, > > I just finished building K2 #6100, and will start my KSB2 tonight. I > am a no-code General, and work primarily SSB QRO, although I look > forward to QRP'ing with my K2. In most cases, for any portable work I > might do, I will most likely carry at least two "enclosures": the K2 > and some sort of antenna tuner. That said, two obvious configuration > for my K2 are: > > 1. K2/100 with separate KAT/100 > > 2. K2 with EC2/KPA100/KAT100 (and KIO2 in the K2) > > Question is: What are the obvious benefits or quirks between the above > setups? Specifically, I am wondering if with the EC2 setup..... > > 1. Whether the KPA100 behaves (i.e., "appears") the same to the K2 as > if it were internal? > > 2. Is it a simple plug-n-play to either use or not use the EC2 setup? > > 3. For QPR ops with the EC2 setup, can you run just the KAT100 without > having to power the KPA100? > > Any and all wisdom will be greatly appreciated! > > Thanks and 73, > Greg > KI4MMM > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [email protected] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
