Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your interesting EMI focused response. 
I had already some experts indicating this possibility of potential EMI 
origin....but no...

Yes, I agree EMI is a tricky issue as per standards/regulations/politics/ and 
technology.
In some areas it is not main stream interest of some industries to avoid 
disturbance/interference  in HF.-Spectrum.
I am an EMC professional since 40 years..

EMI/RFI/EMC I can rule out because:

1.) The effect was also seen recently by a German HAM in a very quiet QTH
2.) I checked the radios (all RX ok on Dummy Load),. The effect it is not only 
visible on K3S P3 , but also on FTDX101MP, and direct front end sampling SDR RX 
Perseus.
3.) I took my mobile HF car setup and operated RX from separated battery, in 
very quiet location , and I could once see this propagation effect. 

So the propagation questions remain.

Questions:
1.      Is this an indication of Multi-Path Reception? May be with different 
propagation modes at that time over certain distances possible?
2.      Is this therefore, e.g., based on delay times (phase/arrival time 
differences) of reflections from different ionospheric layers ( e.g. f1, f2 
etc.) ?
3.      Is this based on quasi simultaneous occurrences of skywave, NVIS and 
may be even groundwave mode ?
4.)     I observed this “ shift effect” also sometimes for OTH-Radar (real or 
faked, yes some are faked, see my qrz.com under DQRM) signals recently on 40m, 
in  EU late afternoon , night time here.


Tnx, Cu, vy 73 de Andy
HB9CVQ, DK2VQ, AK4IG

https://www.qrz.com/db/HB9CVQ


-----Original Message-----
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net <elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net> On 
Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 6:54 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Origin of Signal-Fine Structures in SSB Pass Band 
Waterfall, mainly 80/40m

Hello Andy:

I will offer some experience and opinion....

Your note implies that the interference is coming from the ionosphere, and you 
may be correct, but it is also worth considering that you may be looking at 
digital-based interference from local devices (in addition to possible distant 
signals coming from afar).

Digital signals (square waves, waveforms with sharp edges) have very high 
spectral content (_many_ harmonics), so you may see many lines at constant 
frequency spacing all over the HF spectrum and beyond. 
Switching power supplies (inside electronic devices, wall-warts, etc), and 
digital signals from monitors, computers, routers, coffee makers, washing 
machines, (seems everything that plugs in these days has microprocessors), LED 
lighting, etc. can all cause interference like this.

These sources may also shift or drift (slowly shift) due to changes in 
temperature or operating (power supply/load) conditions in the digital devices.

In my experience the root causes of this kind of RFI are usually the digital 
devices, and possibly poor design for attenuation of the harmonics resulting 
from the oscillators generating the broadband interference lines. Not all 
oscillators are crystal based BTW, so they may have significant change in 
frequency over short or longer time spans. L-C and R-C circuits are just drifty.

BTW, I would also try to see if the lines are from within the radio. Put the 
radio on a dummy load and look at the spectrum. If it is clean, then you can 
probably eliminate the problem as being internal (either hardware or signal 
processing software). Knowing Elecraft, I suspect that the problem will NOT be 
inside the radio, but it is a place to start.

The solution to external RFI _should _be in the design phase of these devices. 
Design should include "right at the source"  shielding of high frequency 
oscillators, power supplies and digital circuits which should use circuit 
layout which shields clock and data circuits with ground lines right in the PC 
board. If you let the signals escape the board, you now have to add ferrites 
and shielding on the wires leading to peripheral devices. It is far better to 
prevent the emissions at the source. But it seems to be cheaper to some 
manufacturers to ignore the problems and trust that your RFI generating device 
will escape scrutiny of regulators.

Devices using high frequency signals are required by the FCC to be inspected 
and to have limits on their emissions. In practice it seems many devices, 
perhaps especially from overseas, have somehow eluded these certifications and 
can become real "firestorms" of RFI. Here in Colorado we have experience with 
grow-light power supplies that have strong emissions for miles around some 
"greenhouses" nearly wiping out the HF spectrum. In my own home, when I had 
ADSL/VDSL internet-phone service, I was able to show service technician the 
spectrum emitted by his cable coming into the house. He confirmed that those 
are the frequencies his equipment used, and when I pointed out that those 
signals become interference if they do not _stay_ inside his cable, he replaced 
the feed cable from the pedestal to my house.

This should be of special interest to hams, who are still attempting to 
communicate using the HF spectrum, though the emissions can still be strong way 
up into VHF and even UHF bands. A local parking lot with solar-powered lighting 
generates signals every 15 KHz right up to high VHF. I suspect that the solar 
panels use MPPT switching chargers to power their batteries.

Perhaps clubs should consider forming RFI committees to investigate this 
interference and try to identify sources, maybe even by manufacturer/model 
number. It is difficult to know when a device exceeds the FCC limits for 
emission without a measurement lab. Maybe the effort would include getting the 
ARRL to either build such a lab or fund tests on apparently noisy consumer 
devices (?).

This has been a slowly growing problem for decades now, and in suburban areas 
HF spectrum can become almost unusable, with so many houses with computers, 
TVs, video cameras, and appliances emitting at low levels and adding up to make 
noise well over S9 at locations of which I am aware. 
No wonder so many hams are using remote stations - perhaps their home stations 
are almost unusable due to RFI.

To troubleshoot, I would recommend powering your radio on a battery and then 
turning off all house power and looking again at the spectrum. If it has 
significantly reduced interference, that source is in the house, and if _not_ 
reduced, it is external (neighborhood or atmospheric). 
Troubleshoot the house by turning on rooms one at a time to see where it is 
coming from. Then plug/unplug devices one at a time to see if you can find a 
single device as a major contributor. If you do this, be aware that some 
appliances, notably refrigerators and  A/C units may need to be off for a 
minute or two to allow the pressurized system to relax before power is again 
applied. Also note that some digital devices like internet routers may take 2 
minutes or so to become fully operational after power is again applied.

RFI is a difficult problem to diagnose, and it seems to me that it is receiving 
very little attention from regulators. Cheap appliances are popular and 
convenient but some may have bad effects on our spectrum. 
Cutting corners in design affects spectrum users, and having dozens of devices 
in every home adds up...

73,

Chris K0PF



On 1/6/2024 6:33 AM, Andy via Elecraft wrote:
> I have a general question to better understand analysis of SSB ( RX 
> Pass
> Band) signals displayed as waterfall, mainly on RX of night 
> time/evening low bands (80m/40m) propagation.
>
>   
>
> (Sorry up to now no waterfall screenshots available yet. Anomality is 
> only sometimes occurring, but not very short lived.
>
>   
>
> Waterfall:
>
> The horizontal axis is frequency , the vertical axis is time and the 
> brightness corresponds to signal amplitude received via any 
> propagation mode (Skywave/NVIS/Groundwave, or mixtures)
>
> Modulation/ splatter become visible.
>
>   
>
> The propagation effect I try to understand does not always occur.
>
>   
>
> It is a "specially (modulated) signal pattern" , a vertical waterfall 
> signal fine structure with periodic signal amplitude (brightness) 
> minima and maxima lines.
>
>   
>
> These lines are sometimes in SSB just straight down vertically with 
> ca. 300 to ca. 400 Hz intervals (6 periods) .
>
> Digital signals seem to have more lines in RX Pass Band on the waterfall.
>
>   
>
> Sometimes in the RX  Pass Band these minima/maxima (QSB) lines are 
> shifted right ( QRG >)
>
> Or at later observation times also may be left shifted (QRG<).
>
>   
>
> I can rule out EMI of broad/narrow band nature. It must be due to 
> propagation of the very observed signal
>
> Sometimes signature appears as " distributed cloud islands" in the 
> vertical SSB PB waterfall band
>
>   
>
>   
>
> I observe for TX SSB Mode (e.g., 2.7kHz BW) in the RX waterfall display :
>
>   
>
> 1.    About 6 Periodic, straight vertical lines (periodic signal amplitude
> minima, which are darker), --normal propagation
>
>   
>
> 2.    About 6 Periodic, right shifted ( staring low f to higher f)
> vertical lines (signal amplitude minima) , --special propagation mode?
>
>   
>
> 3.    About 6 Periodic right shifted ( staring high f to lower f) vertical
> lines (signal amplitude minima) , -- special propagation mode?
>
>   
>
> 4.    The angle to the vertical axis seems to change often over time.
> Probably  according to HF Condx/Propagation?
>
>   
>
> 5.    It seems to be independent of TX LSB or USB mode.
> 6.    Digital signals have often more vertical lines
> 7.    The angle to the vertical axis seems to change often over time,
> according to HF Condx/Propagation.
>
>   
>
> 8.    I have observed this effect also on day on 80m night time on a KIWI
> SDR only 12km away in hilly HB9 ( combination of NVIS/ groundwave?)
>
>   
>
> Questions:
>
> 1.    Is this an indication of Multi-Path Reception? May be with different
> propagation modes at that time over certain distances possible?
> 2.    Is this therefore, e.g., based on delay times (phase/arrival time
> differences) of reflections from different ionospheric layers ( e.g. 
> f1, f2
> etc.) ?
> 3.    Is this based on quasi simultaneous occurrences of skywave, NVIS and
> may be even groundwave mode ?
>
>   
>
> Any comments or reporting of similar observations are greatly appreciated.
>
>   
>
> PS:
>
> I observed this " shift effect" also sometimes for OTH-Radar (real or 
> faked, yes some are faked, see my qrz.com under DQRM) signals recently 
> on 40m, in EU late afternoon , night time here.
>
>   
>
>   
>
> Tnx, Cu, vy 73 de Andy
>
> HB9CVQ, DK2VQ, AK4IG
>
>   
>
>   <https://www.qrz.com/db/HB9CVQ>  https://www.qrz.com/db/HB9CVQ
>
>   
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
> list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered towd5...@frii.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message 
delivered to hb9...@hispeed.ch 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com 

Reply via email to