72% sounds way high to me, and I also think it's a big leap in logic to assume that MFJ quality (materials, connections, etc) is similar to any other reputable company anyway.

DaveĀ  AB7E


On 1/18/2021 3:39 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote:
Hi Alan,

72% sounds a bit high. Is this number based on loop size alone ("in theory")? 
Or are they taking conductor geometry and other losses into account?

Wayne
N6KR


On Jan 18, 2021, at 2:05 PM, Alan Bloom <[email protected]> wrote:

MFJ makes a pair of small, remotely-tuned loop antennas, the MFJ-1786 that 
covers 10-30 MHz and the MFJ-1788 that covers 7 to 21+ MHz.  As far as I can 
tell, the two antennas are identical except for the size of the tuning 
capacitor.  Each consists of a 3 foot (91 cm) diameter loop made of aluminum 
tubing and a plastic housing that contains the tuning capacitor, motor, and 
coupling loop.  No control cable is required since the control voltage is sent 
from the control box in the shack to the motor in the antenna via the coaxial 
cable.

Before I purchase one of these I wanted to get an idea of the efficiency of 
such a small loop.  MFJ is silent on the subject so I did my own calculations.  
The calculations and results are on a 1-page document that I uploaded to 
Dropbox and can be downloaded here:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/l8mv67cjrck2ssn/MFJ-1786-1788.pdf?dl=0

My calculations are based on the assumption that the efficiency of the MFJ 
antennas is similar to the (no longer manufactured) AEA Isoloop (my reasoning 
for that is in the document) and that AEA's specification of 72% efficiency at 
14 MHz is correct.  From that number I can calculate the efficiency and gain on 
all the other bands.

If you don't want to download the document, here is a summary of the results:

Freq    Eff     Gain with respect to a half-wave dipole
MHz     dB      dBd
7.0     -7.3    -7.7
10.1    -3.5    -3.9
14.0    -1.4    -1.8
18.068  -0.6    -1.0
21.0    -0.4    -0.8
24.89   -0.2    -0.6
28.0    -0.15   -0.5

I'd be interested in any comments people may have on the accuracy of
my assumptions and calculations in the document.

Alan N1AL
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to