Looking at the MECC map, I’m pretty sure the 500 KV line is +- 500 KV DC so 
that would by itself make it pretty quiet. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 15, 2019, at 7:34 PM, Fred Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have never found a noise blanker to be of particular value, if any at all, 
> on general power line hash [the "grass" along the baseline of a panadapter.  
> At our prior home in Auburn CA, I had a 3-phase ~70 KV transmission line on  
> running across the lower end of the property that connected a series of 
> hydroelectric plants above and below us, and two 3-phase 112 KV transmission 
> lines on towers about 1/4 mile away.  The 70 KV line was essentially quiet.  
> The 112 KV lines was perhaps S3-4 on 80 and had a fairly high frequency sound 
> ... I guess from the 3-separate phases with peaks occuring at 360 Hz.  The K3 
> NB was ineffective against it.  With the level set high enough to affect the 
> noise level in the headphones, SSB was highly distorted and CW was chopped up.
> 
> Here in NV, we are about 1/2 mile from a 500 KV 3-phase transmission line 
> connecting a power plant in Patrick NV to someplace up in OR, probably along 
> the Columbia.  It is fairly quiet, S2-3 on 80, and again seems to be high 
> frequency enough that the K3 NB is ineffective.  I've concluded that, while 
> technically it all is impulsive [arcs on voltage peaks], the peaks must 
> overlap enough and/or are of a high enough frequency that the NB either can't 
> find them or punches too many too big holes in the signal.  It might be more 
> effective on noise from a single phase line, don't know.
> 
> I rarely hear ignition noise from spark plugs anymore, however the landscape 
> maintenance crew showed up earlier this spring to aerate and de-thatch the 
> grass.  Their aerator gizmo had an old 7 HP engine with strong ignition 
> noise.  The NB took all of it out just fine at very low settings.
> 
> 73,
> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
> Sparks NV DM09dn
> Washoe County
> 
>> On 6/14/2019 11:33 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote:
>> David et al;
>> 
>> My statement is almost word for word from the Elecraft K3 manual.   And some 
>> from work done by Art Collins and company at Collins Radio.  They prescribed 
>> the function of a Noise Blanker as follows:
>> 
>> "The following operational requirements were kept in mind:
>> 
>> 1. Reduction of ignition noise from vehicles.
>> 2. Reduction of power line corona noise occurring at 120 CPS repetition
>>    rates.
>> 3. Reduction of local thunderstorm disturbances.
>> 4. And, in genera

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to