Stephanie, If you really want to know which is the more accurate, you will have to have a good 50 ohm non-reactive dummy load and a means of measuring the RF voltage across it. The Elecraft DL1 will do both nicely because it has a built-in RF detector and has a nice chart of voltage out vs. power. You may want to obtain one to calibrate the wattmeter in the KAT1 (the accuracy will only be as good as your calibration technique).
As for how much you can trust your MFJ wattmeter (dropped or not)?, look at its specs to determine that. I am not certain, but I would venture a guess that is is speced at 10% of full scale - so the next question is what scale are you using? Multiply that by the accuracy specification and you will know how much it could be in error and still be in spec - and that amount of error will be possible no matter what the power level used (it is NOT a percentage of the power level indicated, but a percentage of the full scale reading) - so if you are using a 10 watt scale, and the speced error is 1%, the MFJ could read as much as 1 watt high or 1 watt low - i.e. if the actual power is 2 watts, you may obtain a reading anywhere between 1 and 3 watts. An RF Probe and an accurate dummy load is much better for lower power measurements. If you are drawing comparisons when feeding an antenna instead of a known good dummy load, then the simple RF detector in the K1 will not indicate the actual power output with accuracy. The KAT1 will do that for you if you calibrate it properly. 73, Don W3FPR > -----Original Message----- > > I am wondering how accurate is the built-in metering of the K1? > > For all of my testing and alignment etc. I've been running the K1 > through an MFJ cross-needle HF meter, and I've noticed that there is > a very consistant difference in the display on the MFJ meter and what > the K1 reports. The MFJ meter is always reporting between 1 watt and > 1.5 watts lower power than the K1 indicates. For example, with the > K1 set to 2 watts out, in Tune mode, the display on the K1 wanders > around between 1.9 and 2.2 while the MFJ meter seems quite stable at > 1 watt. At higher powers, such as when finding a peak during > alignment, the K1 indicates as high as 7+ watts, while the MFJ only > goes as high as about 5 watts. > > Normally, I tend to trust the analog meter over the digital stuff, > but in this case the MFJ meter was dropped last month and might have > sustained some damage. Plus, it's not really intended as a QRP meter > so it might not be that accurate at low powers. > > I also have the KAT-1 and I understand that its meter is 'more > accurate' than what's in the base K1, but not really sure how much more. > > Thanks! > > 73 de Stephanie > va3uxb > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
