> Too many Phils! :-)
> 

It is a new problem for me.  Throughout all of my childhood, in school, and 
such, having the name phil has made me unique.  There were all kinds of Jims, 
Bobs, Mikes, Daves, Dicks, but rarely any other phils.  My best friend in 
6th/7th grade (now also a FB friend) is the only other phil I ever knew in 
school (grade school and high school).

If you want to see how rare your name is, go to Wolfram Alpha and type in your 
name.  It will show you a graph of the names popularity over the years and also 
its rank in terms of names and even how many people alive today have that name 
(probably US data only).  Web site is:  www.wolframalpha.com.

You can keep Phil Wheeler and I separate by noting that my name is lower case 
and his is capitalized.

73, phil, K7PEH




> Another cool thing about the KX3 is that RX I/Q output port. Since there is 
> no KXP3 (coming soon...? Maybe) I run the RX I/Q output into the Line In port 
> on my computer and run the free software package NaP3. I'm using an Apple 
> iMac with 27" display, so I have a very nice display of a chunk of band. 
> Using the KX3's Split and Sub features together, I can see where there are 
> holes in a DX pileup, and/or jump right on the frequency of the last guy the 
> DX station is working. Combining this feature with the ability to use the 
> KPA500 and the KAT500 makes the KX3 a very, very spiffy rig. Just like having 
> a K3 with the P3. Almost. Kinda. :-)
> 
> Jim / W6jHB
> 
> On   Friday, Apr 4, 2014, at  Friday, 1:13 PM, Phil Wheeler wrote:
> 
>> Sound good, Phil. I'm pretty new to the K3 and KX3 so I wondered what you 
>> could do with the KX3 but not with the K3. Now I know. I'm just adding the 
>> KPA500/KAT500 now. Redoing the cables in the shack is taking much longer 
>> than I expected.
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> On 4/4/14, 11:17 AM, Phil Hystad wrote:
>>> KX3 has dual-watch and the K3 doesn't.  I would like to use my KX3 for DX 
>>> that often operates split and so far working without also listening on the 
>>> split TX frequency is giving me a clear disadvantage.   This is all CW, not 
>>> SSB.
>>> 
>>> Since I only have the KX3/10 right now, I am thinking that I could use it 
>>> with my KPA500 when I am operating at home.  I have not yet acquired the 
>>> KXPA100.
>>> 
>>> If there is a better alternative (yes, buying the Sub-RX is better but that 
>>> is future too) then let me know.  I don't particular like the REV feature 
>>> for switching TX/RX but it is a cheap alternative but just not as nice as 
>>> dual-watch (or, SubRX).
>>> 
>>> phil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Phil Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Why?
>>>> 
>>>> Phil W7OX
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/4/14, 10:52 AM, Phil Hystad wrote:
>>>>> I am thinking of setting up a configuration to easily switch my KX3 and 
>>>>> K3 with my KPA500.  That is, I want to use both K3 and KX3 to drive 
>>>>> KPA500 without too much cable swapping or re-configuration work.
>>>>> 73, phil, K7PEH
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[email protected]
>> 
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
> 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to