OM's, Please don't assume my question is a lecture on bandwidth.  I am 
interested in the technical aspect of ESSB.  Am I right in thinking the Rx 
stations with standard filter widths are not going to hear the extra Tx width 
of ESSB?

Alan, I did read your reply.

Rich, n0ce
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Grant Youngman 
  To: [email protected] 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [Elecraft] ESSB Equalization


  I wish it were possible to leave the bandwidth wars somewhere else. :(

  You don't want to run ESSB or AM, then don't.  On an uncrowded band there's 
no foul in running AM or ESSB, or any other legal mode. 

  The incessant lectures on bandwidth aren't necessary or fruitful. 

  Grant/NQ5T

  Sent from my iPhone

  On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Don Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote:

  > IMHO, those who want "studio quality" SSB should obtain a commercial 
broadcasting license and use that instead of using the ham bands for "wideband 
SSB".  Not only is it wasted bandwidth, but it is QRM to adjacent stations.  My 
opinion of AM on the ham bands is similar. Technology has advanced to the point 
where minimum bandwidth to achieve effective communications is all that should 
be used, and an audio bandwidth of 300 to 2600 Hz is more than adequate for 
good communications.
  > 
  > 73,
  > Don W3FPR
  > 
  > On 1/27/2013 11:47 PM, Richard Fjeld wrote:
  >> I have watched ESSB signals on the P3 and I have this question;  most 
receivers are limited to as narrow as 2.1 KHz, commonly 2.8 KHz on SSB.  That 
is about all they are going to hear when listening to a wide ESSB signal.  
Unless someone with ESSB is in qso with a station of the same width, isn't it 
going to be wasted bandwidth?
  >> 
  >> Rich, n0ce
  >>     ----- Original Message -----
  >>   From: Matt Zilmer
  >>   To: Mike Markowski
  >>   Cc: [email protected]
  >>   Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 8:08 PM
  >>   Subject: Re: [Elecraft] ESSB Equalization
  >> 
  >> 
  >>   It works quite well too!  Looks like Wide SSB TX and plain SSB TX are
  >>   always left with the same profile.
  >> 
  >>   73,
  >>   matt W6NIA
  > 
  > ______________________________________________________________
  > Elecraft mailing list
  > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  > Post: mailto:[email protected]
  > 
  > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  ______________________________________________________________
  Elecraft mailing list
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
  Post: mailto:[email protected]

  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to