I'm using the KAT500 here with a multi-band NVIS loop for MARS on port one and several other antennas on port 2 which has switched antennae on it. Some of the antennae on port 2 are in the same range as the MARS antenna, but the KAT500 very smoothly handles the tuning correctly on both ports.
Couldn't ask for a better tuner. Thanks to Dick and the rest of the folks at Elecraft for another fine product. 73, Tom Amateur Radio Operator N5GE ARRL Lifetime Member QCWA Lifetime Member On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:57:19 -0800, "Dick Dievendorff" <[email protected]> wrote: >The KAT500 remembers tuner settings by frequency ("band segment" or "bin") >and antenna connector. > >If you have five 80 meter antennas remotely switched, and they're all >different impedances, then you should expect some searching. > >At the other extreme, if your 5-port remote switch selects between five >monobanders and that switching occurs before you transmit on a new band, >then the KAT500 sees the one antenna connector as a single multi-band >antenna. Tuner settings are located by frequency and antenna connector, and >as long as you choose the same antenna each time you transmit on a given >band, then you should expect quick "memory recall" tunes. > >73 de Dick, K6KR > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian Kahn - Ham >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 2:54 PM >To: Elecraft Reflector >Subject: [Elecraft] Using KAT500 With Antenna Switch > >All, > >In the next few weeks, I'll be ordering my KAT500. In my shack, to save on >feed line tangles, I use an MFJ 5-port remote antenna switch. Since I only >have one feed line into the shack, and thus will only use one port on the >KAT500, can I assume that I'll experience (expected) issues with storing >tuning settings in memory? By this, I mean that when I switch back and >forth between my dipole and my 5-band Hexx Beam, the tuner will go through a >tune cycle each time and not necessarily remember the settings? This is >what I expect, given that I plan to only use one antenna port, but want to >verify that my assumption is, indeed, correct. > >Thanks for the bandwidth. > >73, > >-- Ian >Ian Kahn, KM4IK >Roswell, GA EM74ua >[email protected] >K3 #281, P3 #688 >HRD v5.x/6.0 Test Team > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[email protected] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[email protected] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[email protected] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
