Here is the google-drive version of the Antonelli et al. letter to the editor 
in response to Pyron:


https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VJuKuXDP62NQcBdIuIkCi-LqMyRbORv2


Cheers, Tom


Thomas J. Givnish

Henry Allan Gleason Professor of Botany

University of Wisconsin-Madison


[email protected]


________________________________
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news 
<[email protected]> on behalf of Andrew Barton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2017 6:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Editorial on Not Saving Endangered Species

The facts of Dr. Pyron's essay are beside the point.  This is not so much a 
scientific argument as a values one.

Here's what I wrote to the Washington Post in response to his essay.

"This is a blunt anthropocentric value statement masquerading as a scientific 
essay. We don't need all the science surrounding these arguments. They are 
accurate enough. (I'm also an academic biologist, and I also teach these 
concepts and examples.)

Dr. Pyron could have simply written: "Enough of worrying about other species. 
We humans won the evolutionary battle, other species have no value except as 
they contribute to our well-being, and so who cares whether the others go 
extinct. Long live humans."

That viewpoint is abhorrent to me, and it has contributed mightily to the path 
that has led us to environmental destruction, threatening many species, 
including humans."

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Angela Demarse 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thank you for sharing, Howard.

This article embodies my (previously) closeted skepticism/nihilistic 
perspective about conservation of species.

Despite that skepticism, when I think of all the diversity that's vanished, I 
feel an intense loss.

I don't have enough research under my belt to dispute any of the facts in this 
article, but I'd love to know if anyone could present a strong argument (or 
further readings) for the benefits of protecting species diversity?

Best wishes,
Angela Demarse


On Nov 27, 2017 5:37 PM, "Howard S. Neufeld" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
All - This editorial, by Biology Professor R. Alexander Pyron, George 
Washington University, appeared in the Washington Post on November 22. The 
title is: "We Don't Need to Save Endangered Species. Extinction is Part of 
Evolution".

    I haven't seen any comments about this editorial on this listserve, but I 
can tell you that it will be a focus of discussion in my Honors class next 
semester.

    What do you all think about it? Click 
HERE<https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/we-dont-need-to-save-endangered-species-extinction-is-part-of-evolution/2017/11/21/57fc5658-cdb4-11e7-a1a3-0d1e45a6de3d_story.html?utm_term=.52c3dcfcad63>
 to access the editorial.

Howie Neufeld

--
Dr. Howard S. Neufeld, Professor

Mailing Address:
   Department of Biology
   572 Rivers St.
   Appalachian State University
   Boone, NC 28608
   Tel: 828-262-2683<tel:(828)%20262-2683>; Fax 
828-262-2127<tel:(828)%20262-2127>

Websites:
    Academic: http://biology.appstate.edu/faculty-staff/104
    Personal: http://www.appstate.edu/~neufeldhs/index.html
    Fall Colors Academic: http://biology.appstate.edu/fall-colors
    Fall Colors Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FallColorGuy




--


Dr. Andrew Barton

Professor of Biology

University of Maine at Farmington

173 High Street, Preble Hall

Farmington, ME  04938

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


Faculty Coordinator

UMF Sustainable Campus Coalition

sustainablecampus.umf.maine.edu<http://sustainablecampus.umf.maine.edu>

Reply via email to