"Overly broad claims push the peer-review system past its limit. Although I
am a seasoned reviewer, I find it difficult to wade through the increasing
amount of data in papers, and often encounter material where I am not an
expert. If this trend continues, it will be necessary to take
mini-sabbaticals to review papers. Editors might successfully gather
reviewers with complementary backgrounds to examine such broad papers, but
they do so at the expense of having multiple experts scrutinize the same
experiments. And I worry that the supplemental section, which reviewers
tend to inspect less thoroughly, can be used to bury weak data."


http://www.nature.com/news/publish-houses-of-brick-not-mansions-of-straw-1.22029?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20170525&spMailingID=54132792&spUserID=MzUwNzYwMDk5OTgS1&spJobID=1164061838&spReportId=MTE2NDA2MTgzOAS2

-- 
David Duffy
戴大偉 (Dài Dàwěi)
Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit/Makamakaʻāinana
Botany
University of Hawaii/*Ke Kulanui o Hawaiʻi*
3190 Maile Way
Honolulu Hawaii 96822 USA
1-808-956-8218

Reply via email to