Good discussion!  My first encounter with this religious/evolution conflict
was in high school many decades ago.  I was very intrigued by science class
descriptions of dinosaurs and fossils.  During a Sunday evening youth
gathering led by our conservative Presbyterian pastor I asked him about the
difference between the biblical story he was teaching us that describes
creation as a fairly recent event with no mention of much older dinosaurs
and other fossils.  His answer:  "Those were previous creations that
failed."  My unspoken reaction: "So God made mistakes!"   It took me a long
time to recover a religious perspective.  Now I am still Presbyterian and
have no trouble talking about evolution with my progressive church friends.

I've led tours and nature walks and taught church classes that included
evolution-related features.  If I thought that an audience might not all
accept evolution, I'll just use the preface "scientists say." rather than
disturb them by implying that I was promoting rather than just describing a
viewpoint. And, as described in some of the previous posts, the task of a
class instructor is not to change student beliefs but rather to teach them
the information they need to understand (but not necessarily accept)
scientific principles.

And evolution is not a "belief"  -- it's a little weak to say "I believe in
evolution" when evolution is a scientific theory that explains, describes
and predicts biological development.  We don't say "I believe in calculus"
but, even if we don't fully comprehend it, we know that it provides useful
tools and methods for turning numerical information into reliable facts.

 

 


Warren W. Aney

Senior Wildlife Ecologist

9403 SW 74th Ave.

Tigard, OR  97223

(503) 539-1009

[email protected]

 

 

 

From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of wresetar
Sent: 05 July, 2015 12:51
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] teaching evolution in ecology courses

 

You are absolutely correct - it is a sticky wicket.   But to the extent that
Christianity as a whole is viewed as a religion, albeit with many
denominations, it is (perhaps -  always context dependent) worth at least
dispelling the widespread notion that opposition to evolution is a universal
Christian thing.  This is certainly the impression one gets from many
elements of mainstream media, even those that know better.

 

William J. Resetarits, Jr.

Professor of Biology and

Henry L. and Grace Doherty Chair in Freshwater Research

Department of Biology

The University of Mississippi

P.O. Box 1848
University, MS 38677-1848

Phone: (662) 915-5804

Fax: (662) 915-6554

http://www.olemiss.edu/resetaritslab

 

Experiments are only experience carefully planned in advance.   R. A. Fisher

 

You can't step twice in the same river.   Heraclitus

 

From: Malcolm McCallum <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, July 5, 2015 at 2:40 PM
To: William Resetarits <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] teaching evolution in ecology courses

 

I think the value of what you just mentioned is that most people don't know
that there is no issue with their own religion and evolution.  

 

However, where I was coming from is a step different from that, because most
whose religion have no issue, end up having no issue.  

However, there is a serious risk of the student thinking you are criticizing
their religion, which will literally cause tons of grief.  When you say,
plenty of religions have no problem with it, SOME (not all or even most)
will interpret that more like "other religions have no problem, so what is
wrong with yours?" or other sorts of imagined criticisms.  Its a real tight
rope with some of the extreme religious views.  Also, I suspect that teh
approach you take is going to be very dependent on the kind of student you
are dealing with.  I suspect that the students you get at Ole Miss are
significantly more prepared than a open (wide-open) enrollment university.
The approaches to students are completely different.  I learned this going
from LSUS to TAMUT to UMKC.  At UMKC students largely knew exactly why they
were in school ad how to be their.  They were more prepared, but by NO MEANS
were they on average smarter.  However, your approach would have worked well
with most of them, I suspect.  IF students have poor academic backgrounds
(in attainment or in exposure) their ability to interpret your motives are
also poorly developed.  At least that is my experience.  I'm sure others
have plenty of other views. 

 

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:32 PM, wresetar <[email protected]> wrote:

While care needs to be taken to avoid seeming confrontational, it may also
be worth pointing out to students, if the issue arises, that even in this
country a large majority of the populace belong to religions that do not
consider their doctrine and the theory of evolution to be incompatible.
http://www.pewforum.org/2009/02/04/religious-groups-views-on-evolution/

 

This is true even among the Christian population - so not everyone considers
religion and evolution at odds.  I doubt many of those who reject evolution
are remotely aware of this.

 

Then there is my personal favorite for mainstreaming evolution.  Sigh.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_U7QmAM2W0g/UVFm9wyrWSI/AAAAAAAAjFg/EzTKrMO7nOg/s1
600/DarwinTenPoundNote.jpg

 

William J. Resetarits, Jr.

Professor of Biology and

Henry L. and Grace Doherty Chair in Freshwater Research

Department of Biology

The University of Mississippi

P.O. Box 1848
University, MS 38677-1848

Phone: (662) 915-5804

Fax: (662) 915-6554

http://www.olemiss.edu/resetaritslab

 

Experiments are only experience carefully planned in advance.   R. A. Fisher

 

You can't step twice in the same river.   Heraclitus

 

From: Malcolm McCallum <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Malcolm McCallum <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, July 5, 2015 at 12:07 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] teaching evolution in ecology courses

 

I have no doubt that many who are from firm, literalistic religions have
this problem.  

Early on when I was a student, I struggled with the conflict I thought
existed between religion and evolution. After taking a pile of evolution
coures I slowly transitioned.  IT was not a sudden lightbulb coming on.    I
think everyone deals with it differently when confronted with the logic of
evolution and how it sometimes conflicts with the dogma of some religions.
I concluded as an instructor that I was not going to change in a semester, a
set of beliefs that this person has evolved over 18 or more years of life.
I also kinda believe that many of the most intelligent are the most stubborn
to accept contrary views. So, my goal was not to challenge those beliefs,
but avoid the entire issue via a cop out.  Rather, get the student to learn
the facts they need to know and understand them.  For the most part, I was
able to do this.   

 

1) Most of my classes are entrenched in evolutionary biology as I often
bring it up even in A&P, but seldom ever have any problems, even though I
have taught it in some very bible beltish areas.  However, when I teach
ecology its there from day one, they know it is going to be there and I use
an abbreviated version of my introduction from general bio shpeal.  IN
general bio, I tell them, "I am not trying to change your beliefs, or turn
you into an athiest.  You have a right to believe whatever you want, I'm not
here to change what you believe.  I'm here to teach you biology, and
evolution is central to biology.  Whether you believe in evolution or not,
if you are in biology, you must understand it and you must know how it
works.  Besides, learning what it is and what it is not can only strenghthen
your beliefs because you are not blindly saying you don't believe in
something, instead you know what it is you don't believe.  Regardless, if
you are going to be a biologist, MD, Nurse or dentist, you must be versed in
evolution, period.  IF you don't, you will not make it through freshman
biology.  This course is about learning what the science of biology is
about, it is not about religion.  Evolution is biology.  If you do not learn
it, your will be as successful in biology as someone who can't add would be
in mathematics.  You can disbelieve the laws of addition all you want, but
if you cannot follow their rules, you are not going to make it through math.
Likewise, you must know the rules of evolution or you will not make it." 

 

This is in a lot of ways a cop out for both the instructor and the student.
It allows the instructor to approach the issue without challenging student
beliefs, and it allows students who do not want to believe, the opportunity
to learn without the conflicting underlying moral and emotional conflicts
getting in the way. They are not being asked to believe anything, they are
being asked to repeat what they don't believe.  That is basically how I
approach it.  THe commentary is not exactly worded like that everytime, but
that is pretty darn close.  It might not work for every instructor, but it
has for me (I think). 

 

2) Of course, the first thing I do after this in freshman biology class is
tell them the downright basic idea of evolution is "things change over
time." I state that exact phrase everytime I teach it.  then, "A major
question in biology is why did they change?"  

 

I then insert a simple example with dogs or cows or something very familiar,
"for example, we have tons of breeds of dogs.  They are all different
breeds, but they are all actually wolves, right? We know they are wolves.
This is not new.  But, why have the breeds of dogs changed so much over
time?  

 

Well, because a bunch of people chose to select some traits over others
while breeding them.  Some people wanted great sheep herders, others wanted
dogs that could run fast, or could rip your arm off.  So, they kept breeding
teh ones with the most muscular jaws or fastest speed or best herding
ability. Over time, this selective breeding led to pit bulls, border
collies, and greyhounds....all wolves!  

 

In some cases, we have selected dogs so extremely that they are largely
incompatable for breeding.  For example, there is nothing stopping a Saint
Bernard sperm from fertilizing a chiuahua's egg (usually some giggles from
the class), but if it did, the resulting embryo may grow too big to pass
thorugh the birth canal, resulting in the death of the pup and mother.
Also, there are mechanical problems here that transcend that minor problem.
(almost always there are giggles here by the class).  Obviously, the two
dogs cannot breed naturally anymore.  

 

This same thing can happen in nature too.  For a ficticous example, you can
have one forest where dogs that are bigger survive better than little dogs
because the available prey are really big making it easier for big dogs to
get food.  In a nearby forest the opposite thing is hapening.  THere are
only a few prey species available, and the dogs must live off of these
measley little animals.  OVer time, smaller dogs do better and the smaller
they are the better they do in that forest, so the food supply continues to
select smaller and smaller dogs among the litters of pups.  The smaller dog
requires less food, so it can live off of these prey very easily, and the
bigger the dog the more food it needs, so the larger the dog, the worse it
does in that forest. Over time, teh selection due to the kinds of available
prey cause big dogs to largely disappear from the second forest leaving
smaller dogs.  The forests for some reason get re-connected after a long
time (centuries or millenia) and the two groups of dogs intermingle, one
bigger than a saint bernard, teh other smaller than a chihuahua.   They
won't interbreed due to mechanical reasons so largely, you will have the
start of two groups of animals changing over time or evolving to form tow
different and increasingly more divergent organsims.  Over thousands of
years, they may easily become so different as to be two separate species,
one a mouse-sized dog, the other a elephant-sized dog.

  

The only difference between the artifical selection that resulted in two
different dogs, and the natural selection that resulted in the same outcome
is the cause, or why the dogs changed over time or evolved.  That is how
evolution works, and it is pretty easy to understand how it works."

 

 3)  I've used this basic strategy since I first taught a college biology
class in 1995 (before I went back for a phd), and I have never had more than
an inquiry about evolution-religion conflicts.  They complain about tests
being too hard or having to read the book, like in anyone else's class, but
seldom ever about the evolution-religion issue.  

 

In the very few times a student talked to me about the conflict, I just tell
him or her that its good that they have well-formed beliefs and I am not
asking you to believe anything.  In fact, you should not just blankly accept
what I tell you just because I or anyone else said it.  You should require
proof something is right or wrong. But, for this class you need to be able
to repeat what I tell you and what you read in class about evolution and
understand what it means.  I will say that I believe 90% of telling them
this is body language and manerisms that ensure them that I am just wanting
them to learn what they need to know.  It certainly defuses nearly all
conflicts.  YOu are just helping them learn what they need to know for the
tests.  

 

Frankly, I don't see how someone can learn what evolution and natural
selection are and not conclude some level of acceptance, but everyone is
different, I am not going to change 20 years of religious learning, but I
can at least end up with an informed student walking out of my door at the
end of the semester.  Maybe that attitude has more to do with it than
anything?  Heck if I know.  All I know is that this has worked for me and if
it helps a student learn the material without moral conflicts to get in the
way, all the better.   

 

On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:09 AM, David Inouye <[email protected]> wrote:

It would be interesting to preface discussions of evolution in ecology
courses with a few minutes about the cognitive differences considered in the
paper mentioned in this NPR story:

http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/06/29/418289762/don-t-believe-in-evolu
tion-try-thinking-harder?utm_source=npr_newsletter
<http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/06/29/418289762/don-t-believe-in-evol
ution-try-thinking-harder?utm_source=npr_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_con
tent=20150705&utm_campaign=mostemailed&utm_term=nprnews>
&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20150705&utm_campaign=mostemailed&utm_term=npr
news

I wonder whether some of the students I taught in introductory
ecology/evolution who were resistant to the idea of evolution might have
been influenced by this.

David Inouye


Dr. David W. Inouye, Professor Emeritus
Department of Biology
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-4415

2014-15: President, Ecological Society of America

Principal Investigator
Rocky Mtn. Biological Laboratory
PO Box 519
Crested Butte, CO 81224

[email protected]
301-405-6946  





 

-- 

Malcolm L. McCallum, PHD, REP

Environmental Studies Program

Green Mountain College

Poultney, Vermont

Link to online CV and portfolio :
https://www.visualcv.com/malcolm-mc-callum?access=18A9RYkDGxO

 "Nothing is more priceless and worthy of preservation than the rich array
of animal life with which our country has been blessed. It is a many-faceted
treasure, of value to scholars, scientists, and nature lovers alike, and it
forms a vital part of the heritage we all share as Americans."
-President Richard Nixon upon signing the Endangered Species Act of 1973
into law.

"Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" - Allan
Nation

1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea"  W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
            and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
          MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi)
Wealth w/o work
Pleasure w/o conscience
Knowledge w/o character
Commerce w/o morality
Science w/o humanity
Worship w/o sacrifice
Politics w/o principle

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.





 

-- 

Malcolm L. McCallum, PHD, REP

Link to online CV and portfolio :
<https://www.visualcv.com/malcolm-mc-callum?access=18A9RYkDGxO>
https://www.visualcv.com/malcolm-mc-callum?access=18A9RYkDGxO


 "Nothing is more priceless and worthy of preservation than the rich array
of animal life with which our country has been blessed. It is a many-faceted
treasure, of value to scholars, scientists, and nature lovers alike, and it
forms a vital part of the heritage we all share as Americans."
-President Richard Nixon upon signing the Endangered Species Act of 1973
into law.

"Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" - Allan
Nation

1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea"  W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
            and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
          MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi)
Wealth w/o work
Pleasure w/o conscience
Knowledge w/o character
Commerce w/o morality
Science w/o humanity
Worship w/o sacrifice
Politics w/o principle

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.

Reply via email to