Penguin biologists are particularly proud of this contribution:

Meyer-Rochow, V. B. and J. Gal. 2003. Pressures produced when penguins pooh
- calculations on avian defaecation. Polar Biol. 27:56-58.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00300-003-0563-3

and there is also a letter describing how it came to be:

Meyer-Rochow, V. B. and J. Gal. 2006. A "Polar biology publication" that
prevailed: Forces at work when penguins poo. Polar Biol. 29:541-542.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00300-006-0125-6

Michael Schrimpf
Stony Brook University



On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Kevyn Juneau <[email protected]> wrote:

> McNOLEG, O. L. E. G. "The integration of GIS, remote sensing, expert
> systems and adaptive co-kriging for environmental habitat modeling of the
> highland haggis using object-oriented, fuzzy-logic and neural-network
> techniques." *Computers & Geosciences* 22.5 (1996): 585-588.
>
> ftp://46.43.34.31/users/kami/humour/haggis_paper.pdf
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Alex Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Another paper that's tongue-in-cheek but has serious science at its core:
> >
> > Lozier, J. D., Aniello, P. and Hickerson, M. J. (2009), Predicting the
> > distribution of Sasquatch in western North America: anything goes with
> > ecological niche modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 36: 1623-1627. doi:
> > 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02152.x
> >
> > ABSTRACT: The availability of user-friendly software and publicly
> > available biodiversity databases has led to a rapid increase in the use
> of
> > ecological niche modelling to predict species distributions. A potential
> > source of error in publicly available data that may affect the accuracy
> of
> > ecological niche models (ENMs), and one that is difficult to correct for,
> > is incorrect (or incomplete) taxonomy. Here we remind researchers of the
> > need for careful evaluation of database records prior to use in
> modelling,
> > especially when the presence of cryptic species is suspected or many
> > records are based on indirect evidence. To draw attention to this
> potential
> > problem, we construct ENMs for the North American Sasquatch (i.e.
> Bigfoot).
> > Specifically, we use a large database of georeferenced putative sightings
> > and footprints for Sasquatch in western North America, demonstrating how
> > convincing environmentally predicted distributions of a taxon's potential
> > range can be generated from questionable site-occurrence data. We compare
> > the distribution of Bigfoot with an ENM for the black bear, Ursus
> > americanus, and suggest that many sightings of this cryptozoid may be
> cases
> > of mistaken identity.
> >
> > PDF available through Google Scholar.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alex
> >
> > Alex Wolf
> > Resource Staff Scientist, Forest Systems Field Station
> > Missouri Department of Conservation
> > 2929 Co. Rd. 618
> > Ellington, MO 63638
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ************************************************************
>
> Kevyn J. Juneau, Ph.D., Certified Associate Ecologist
> Department of Biological Sciences
> 1400 Townsend Drive
> Michigan Technological University
> Houghton, MI 49931
> KJJuneau(at)MTU.edu
> http://kevynjuneau.weebly.com/
>

Reply via email to