I received many responses to my request for recommendations for timelapse 
cameras to use at field sites—thanks everyone for your advice and for 
sharing your experiences. Almost everyone recommended a different 
camera/set-up, however, which makes deciding which to try more challenging 
but provides lots of good options. I didn’t get any “stay away from…” 
advice, but each seems to come with its own pros and cons. I’ve summarized 
them below with contact info from folks who are good resources for these 
devices. I haven’t yet decided which I’ll use, but I really appreciate this 
valuable feedback!





Wingscapes Birdcams & Plantcams (~$100) [specs: photos + video, includes 
software to stitch photos together, 52° FOV, can add solar powerpanel $80]

– PROS: (used to record streams & stormwater ponds) inexpensive, easy to 
install/use, rainproof, works well

– CONS: lens isn’t the greatest (fixed focus), FOV is limited

Recommended by (for more info): Mark Sommerfield 
([email protected]), Montgomery Co., MD DEP and 
Matthias Peichl ([email protected]), Swedish Univ of Agricultural 
Sciences



Moultrie Game Spy Plot Stalker (~$100) [specs: 8.0 MP, software stitches 
time-lapse images together, 16 MB internal memory (expandable to 32 GB w/SD 
card), 4 AA batteries or attach Moultrie Power Panel (solar, ~$50])

– PROS: (used to record stream flow) decent waterproof housing; several 
photo resolution and frequency settings; good battery life

– CONS: had to construct additional lock box for data security

Recommended by (for more info): Ana Morales ([email protected]), Iowa 
State Univ



Wingscapes TimelapseCam 8.0 (~$100) [specs: 40-43°FOV, photo + video, 4AA 
batteries, 8 MP]

– PROS: (used to record rattlesnake behavior) solar panels available to 
extend battery life; image quality is pretty good (able to ID snake species)

– CONS: shut off in very hot weather (>90 F in full sun)

Recommended by (for more info): Melissa Amarello ([email protected]), 
www.socialsnakes.org



Bushnell TrophyCam HD (~$200) [specs: 8 MP, HD video w/audio record; hyper 
night vision; tags images w/GPS coords, widescreen or full-screen setups, 
up to 32GB SD-card capacity]

– PROS: has field scan mode that you can use for set time pictures and a 
motion detector; affordable, batter life is extremely long (runs on AAs); 
they make protective lockboxes that you could easily waterproof; has flash; 
8 MP camera gets good shots with relatively wide FOV

– CONS: 

Recommended by (for more info): Britt Johnson ([email protected]), 
Desert Research Institute



DLC Covert Extreme Red 40 (~$200) [specs: 8MP w/video, built-in 2”LCD 
viewer]

– PROS: (used for camera trapping of shorebirds); pretty good time interval 
presets and decent battery life; very weatherproof

– CONS: some camera failure (1 in 7 in extreme rainy/humid weather)

Recommended by (for more info): Ana Guerra ([email protected]), 
Stanford Univ



Canon A810 (~$75) w/ power adapter kit and 12V to 3V converter & waterproof 
housing (~$200)

– PROS: can install CHDK script to have hourly pictures taken; wider field 
of view & better picture quality (compared birdcams)

– CONS: more complex configuration than packaged trailcams

Recommended by (for more info): Matthias Peichl ([email protected]), 
Swedish Univ of Agricultural Sciences



GoPro Hero2s (~$300) w/ ‘Cam-do’ time-lapse controller (~$100) and battery 
backpack (~$50) [specs: small, light, HD, 1080p video, 170° wide angle, 
11MP photos @10 photos/sec]

– PROS: (used underwater) very waterproof; great battery life

– CONS: more expensive than backyard birdcam; Cam-do customer service & 
manual not user-friendly

Recommended by (for more info): Kevin Turner ([email protected]), Univ of 
Washington



Reconyx (>$450) [several models available]

– PROS: (used to record stream & ice dynamics throughout winter months) 
good battery life, options for timed and motion photos; very rugged- held 
up well in cold and wet weather (SD winter)

– CONS: costly

Recommended by (for more info): Malia Volke ([email protected]), 
South Dakota State Univ

Reply via email to