And lets not forget the alarming large percentage of single mothers out there. 
They are doing all of it. I think the NSF should consider those women who have 
no help whatsoever.. Out of choice or desperation - it Dosent matter.. For that 
matter.. Single fathers should have the same benefit. 
Lets face it guys - today's world songs a different song. We have a lot of 
single parents out there and that cannot be gone unnoticed. Because the realty 
in today's world is a 'single parent'. 
We need to do something to aid these people, if we want the population to stay 
here in fifty years that is.
Thanks 

Raj Kamthe

On Jul 6, 2013, at 10:39 PM, "Joos, Cara (MU-Student)" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Isn't the issue here really simply that, generally, (I realize there are same 
sex couples and single parents but lets set that aside for now) one man and one 
woman choose to have children. The woman should not have a disproportionately 
more negative effect on her career than the man. This gets away from singles vs 
married and kids vs no kids. Whether, in general, people with children should 
be expected to perform at the same level as people without children is a 
different topic. This is about making sure women are not left behind because of 
the physical demands of pregnancy and breast feeding etc. There will never be 
equality in academia without addressing this unavoidable reality.



Cara Joos PhD
University of Missouri
Biological Sciences
105 Tucker Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>




On Jul 6, 2013, at 2:40 PM, David L. McNeely 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I assume you are not serious.

What people who find fault with NSF doing this fail to acknowledge is that NSF 
is responsible for the furtherance of science.  Projects suffer when 
participants must be away for family matters.  So science suffers, and NSF 
money goes to waste.  By providing PIs small grants to temporarily replace 
workers who must be away for family reasons, NSF is salvaging its projects.

I assume that PIs have hiring and firing authority.  Being absent for 
recreational reasons and letting the project suffer would in my mind justify 
replacement of such personnel.  That shouldn't be hard to do in today's 
employment climate.

PIs may be faced with an institutional family leave policy that requires that 
they provide time off for family reasons (which is a legitimate institutional 
policy -- it helps retain employees in which the institution may have valuable 
training invested).  This policy provides for PIs to work around the difficulty 
to projects that that might cause.

NSF seems to be responding to a need among grantees.    David McNeely

---- "David M. Lawrence" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What other choices that might "compete with their professional career,"
would warrant such an opportunity, Michael?  The proposal here looks a
bit half (if that) baked.

Few other "choices" invoke such a huge emotional, financial -- and LEGAL
-- burden as parenthood.  Being a caregiver for old or ailing relatives
might certainly warrant such treatment, but let's say your choice is
scuba diving (a choice I am afflicted with). It is a personal choice, it
involves costs in terms of money and time -- and if done enough, could
interfere with my professional career.  So should I be eligible for NSF
help to help with my recreational diving habit?  [For the sake of
argument, let's ignore the fact that my dissertation is focusing on
coral reefs and will involve some diving.]

Dave

On 7/4/2013 10:47 PM, Michael Clary wrote:
We are all much too busy managing our work and families, parents no longer own 
that distinction. To the degree that parenthood has been an informed choice for 
the average postdoc for some time, my modest proposal would be to make this 
opportunity available to any early career scientist who has made a personal 
decision that was reasonably certain to compete with their professional career.

Michael





--
------------------------------------------------------
David M. Lawrence        | Home:  (804) 559-9786
6467 Hanna Drive         | Cell:  (804) 305-5234
Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
USA                      | http:  http://fuzzo.com
------------------------------------------------------

"All drains lead to the ocean."  -- Gill, Finding Nemo

"We have met the enemy and he is us."  -- Pogo

"No trespassing
4/17 of a haiku"  --  Richard Brautigan

--
David McNeely

Reply via email to