I heartily agree. Easy for EO to say math isn't important; he doesn't mention 
his collaboration with the mathematically inclined Robert Macarthur, leading to 
the theory of island biogeography. And the problems with Wilson's foray into 
group selection theory are testimony to the kinds of problems people without 
strong math skills can get into, especially if they're seduced by 
mathematicians without a solid ecological/evolutionary grounding. 

Yes, it might be true that most mathematicians lack strong ecological 
intuition. But so do many ecologists! There is a substantial list of people we 
could cite who have made major contributions to ecology and evolutionary 
biology in no small part because they do have a strong mathematical background. 
Why aren't they mentioned? Or don't they exist, in Wilson's worldview? In 
Wilson's case, math was not his strong suit; arguably, writing was. So should 
we advise students NOT to enter ecology if their writing isn't up to Pulitzer 
caliber? I hope not. People can bring a variety of skills to bear to make a 
contribution in almost any field. Writing off mathematical ability, as Wilson 
does, doesn't help, and trivializes the profound insights that mathematically 
savvy, ecologically well-grounded scientists have provided. And it reinforces 
the delusion that many people "aren't good at math", when in fact they didn't 
have a good set of math teachers, or took the math at the wrong stage of their 
development.

Thomas J. Givnish
Henry Allan Gleason Professor of Botany
University of Wisconsin

[email protected]
http://botany.wisc.edu/givnish/Givnish/Welcome.html





On 04/09/13, Mitch Cruzan  wrote:
> I couldn't agree more - it can only help.
> 
> On 4/9/2013 6:22 PM, David Inouye wrote:
> >Don't Listen to E.O. Wilson
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Math can help you in almost any career. There's no reason to fear it.
> >
> ><http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/04/e_o_wilson_is_wrong_about_math_and_science.html>http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/04/e_o_wilson_is_wrong_about_math_and_science.html

--

Reply via email to