Aaron, you seem to have a whole lot on your mind re this topic!

Clearly, for a spousal hire to take place, one of the spice had to have many of 
the properties to which I alluded, and it's really unlikely that the other 
would be hired unless he/she also had such abilities and achievements as well, 
although in less superlative supplies.


Not all spousal hires are what they seem. Sometimes universities get a great 
deal by offering one position (plus two sets of benefits) to two people.


For most applicants for faculty jobs, it's a buyers' market, with the 
institutions having a bit of an upper hand. But it's a sellers' market for the 
top people, and spousal hires are a major inducement used to recruit the top 
folks. The cost of recruiting a sub-par faculty member who winds up not getting 
tenure – in terms of start-up and renovation costs, direct and indirect 
research costs foregone, students and post-docs foregone, and negative impact 
on a department's reputation nationally and internationally, to say nothing of 
the life-long adverse (often, hugely adverse) impacts on the faculty member 
him/herself – are simply too great for departments not to try their damnedest 
to recruit the person(s) they see having the greatest potential.


At least in the cases with which I'm familiar, spousal hires at the 
tenure-track level are hardly automatic, and alternative appointments of a 
spouse as a research assistant or senior scientist or academic staff are the 
most likely development if the spouse really isn't up to tenure-track standards 
at the institution in question. Such appointments are almost always put on the 
leadership of a non-spouse, to avoid problems of nepotism (or even worse 
problems if a divorce occurs). And spousal hires at the faculty level often 
(but not always) are made in other departments, for many of the same reasons.


I believe that an increased emphasis on spousal hires in academics is a humane 
development. It's one of the very few ways that academic jobs have become less 
daunting over the past twenty years. I don't have data, but I suspect 
faculty-faculty marriages split much more frequently 30 years ago, when spousal 
hires were rare, than they do today. That's a good thing (a very good thing) 
for faculty and especially for their children.


Cheers, Tom


Thomas J. Givnish
Henry Allan Gleason Professor of Botany
University of Wisconsin

[email protected]
http://botany.wisc.edu/givnish/Givnish/Welcome.html




On 10/20/12, "Aaron T. Dossey"  wrote:
> 
> How do you explain the very high number of spousal hires?
> 
> 
> On 10/18/2012 10:03 PM, Thomas J. Givnish wrote:
> >you need excellent research, combined with strong writing and oral 
> >presentation skills, ability to think on your feet, and empathy to interact 
> >well with students and colleagues, to have a real chance of success at 
> >landing a job at first- or second-tier universities.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Aaron T. Dossey, Ph.D.
> Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
> Founder/Owner: All Things Bugs
> Capitalizing on Low-Crawling Fruit from Insect-Based Innovation
> http://allthingsbugs.com/about/people/
> http://www.facebook.com/Allthingsbugs
> 1-352-281-3643

--

Reply via email to