As I am cleaning up past e-mails, and believe it was during a discussion when 
someone was trying to convince Mike Comet that he and Snakes could be on 
friendly terms some day. It still could happen, needs to be a VERY slow 
desensitization process in this extreme case! I have seen kids who at the 
beginning of the semester would barely come in the room and at the end of the 
semester, they were the same ones signing up to take one of our Snakes home.

So, someone above made the point about Snakes not even being present on some 
Islands years ago, and that is no longer the case. The Brown Snake on Guam is a 
good example and it has wreaked total havoc with indigenous Birds here.

Below is another remote Island, but now some real footage of an invasive Rat 
killing a young Petrel. Sad to watch.

Mike Nolan....see below

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_Island_%28Pitcairn_Islands%29

Another video of a rat attacking a seabird:
http://www.arkive.org/henderson-petrel/pterodroma-atrata/video-14.html.
 There was an unsuccessful attempt to remove rats on Henderson recently.
Details can be googled. Those interested in the science might consult: Brooke
MdeL, O\'Connell TC, Wingate D, Madeiros J, Hilton GM, Ratcliffe N (2010)
Potential for rat predation to cause decline of the globally threatened
Henderson petrel *Pterodroma atrata*: evidence from the field, stable
isotopes and population modelling. Endang Species Res 11:47-59

On the Samoan  rat video commentary

"Given the strong, a priori rat indictment, it is also unclear whether any
other finding would be acceptable to the investigators." Is this an opinion
or *ex cathedra*? Do you have any actual reason to doubt the
impartiality/professionalism of the researcher? Attacking grad students is
not very impressive, especially if you don't read what they actually said:
http://www.petridish.org/projects/saving-an-endangered-bird-the-mao: "To
understand the impact of introduced predators we are putting nest cameras
on morenests to determine if adult birds are also at risk. (Contrary to
Matt's assertion, the proposal says nothing about cameras to document
further rat predation on chicks although it is true that  such coverage
might refine estimates of incidence of such predation)" and "We are also
trying to determine if other predators (like feral cats) are affecting
young birds after they leave the nest by tracking chicks with transmitters.
(Transmitters are different from cameras)"

"It would be interesting to know.  Knowing either way would not necessarily
improve conservation efforts." The recovery plan
http://www.sprep.org/att/IRC/eCOPIES/Countries/Samoa/53.pdf makes it clear
that the species is disappearing in forest, as well as following forest
destruction  (p. 9). Rats or cats are suggested as a cause of loss in
forest.  As the plan suggests, there is now the capability to remove black
rats over large areas and populations of Mao could be established on rat
free islands. It appears abundantly clear in a real world sense that
knowing the effect of rats would "improve conservation efforts" by defining
choices.

 "I wonder if rats could learn to associate human activity with food
sources."  Rat association with humans seems to have started with the
arrival of agriculture (cf
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026357).
Cats as commenseals with humans for rodent control go back almost ten
thousand years in  Egypt, suggesting rats learned the association a rather
long time ago (JA Serpell - The domestic cat: The biology of its behaviour,
2000). There is a rather large literature that answers this question,
albeit the question appears irrelevant here.

I am sure no one would accuse Matt of bloviating academic logorrhea, but I
for one would wish he would read more carefully and reflect more on what he
says before he says it.

Cheers,

David


----------

If we are on another line or away from the phone, please leave your number, 
best time to return your call and your e-mail address.
 
After hours and weekend phone appointments are available upon request.

Sincerely,

J. Michael Nolan, Director
 
Rainforest and Reef

******************************************************************************************
"Outstanding-Affordable Field Courses in Rainforest & Marine Ecology"

Destinations that we Specialize in: 

North America....Alaska (Southeast and the Interior), Hawaii, British Columbia, 
the Florida Keys and Everglades National Park.

Caribbean....Curacao

Central America....Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and 
Panamá.

South America....Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador and The Galápagos Islands, Péru, 
including Cuzco and Machu Picchu.

Mexico....The Baja Peninsula (especially during the Spring Whale Migration and 
Breeding season).

East Africa....Kenya, Tanzania and Zanzibar Island.

Australia and New Zealand.

Birding, Photography, along with Home and Garden Tours are available upon 
request to Most Destinations that we offer.

The following "Research/Conservation Expeditions" are now also available upon 
request...Endangered Species of Brazil; Macaws and Primates of the Peruvian 
Amazon (Tambopata-Candamo Reserve Zone) and Endangered Sea Turtles of Costa 
Rica (latinamericanseaturtles.org or widecast.org).

Spanish/Cultural Immersion Programs are available in Costa Rica, Panamá, 
Ecuador, Péru, Bolivia and Spain.

Sea Kayaking is available in British Columbia, Southeast Alaska, Baja Mexico, 
Belize and The Galápagos Islands.

References/Comments from past Group Leaders are at our Website, many more are 
available upon request. 

Rainforest and Reef
161 Main St. 
Coopersville, MI 49404 
Local/International Phone: 1.616.604.0546
Toll Free U.S. and Canada: 1.877.255.3721
Fax: 1.616.604.0546
Google Talk/MS IM/Skype: travelwithrandr
AOL IM: buddythemacaw
E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]
Note: Please send inquiries to both e-mail addresses
Web: http://rainforestandreef.org (under revision for 2013 and beyond)
******************************************************************************************

Reply via email to