Hi again Eco-Enthusiasts,

I received a huuuge* list of responses from all of you regarding advice for
a personal laptop, and I'm very grateful. I wanted to write out a quick
summary in case any other incoming grads or near-future grads were
wondering any of the same questions.

Firstly, check with your program to see whether or not your lab and
affiliated other labs are Mac People or PC People. Compatibility issues can
be a huge pain, and lose you an awful lot of time and, so you don't want to
be the odd one out in your group. It turns out that my future lab at
Harvard is not only composed of Mac people, and I also learned that they
will provide me with a Mac desktop(!). So for me, Mac became an obvious
choice.

HOWEVER, if I knew I was going to be doing a lot of Arc-Gis, the consensus
from the crowd is that a PC desktop is pretty much necessary for running
that program in heavy doses. There are ways to run Arc-Gis on a Mac through
the Windows environment, which one person warned is very slow. Half a dozen
people commented that, depending on the scope of your analysis, running
Arc-Gis through Windows on a PC with ample space is critical.

Other reasons NOT to get a Mac, which may apply to some people: It can be
hard to get Macs to run certain types of stats packages, such as for
Bayesian models, WinRhizo, or multivariate stats. The battery life is also
not spectacular, but there are ways to get around that for field work if
you invest up front.

Several people suggested that one can save money by purchasing refurbished
laptops. The most common non-Mac computer recommended was a Toshiba
Satellite (which is what I had through undergrad. It did serve me well).
Others include the Lenovo Thinkpads and the Dell Latitude EGH20.

Overall, I received almost twice as many recommendations for Apple over
other computer types, but I recognize that I seeded the question with my
preference so it's not a completely fair survey. Both the Macbook Pro and
Air were popular, and the Air was voted especially great for field work
because of its lightness and longer battery life. The Pro has more space,
however.

Other benefits of a Mac: Timeline is great for automatically backing up all
of your files. The hardware and software is especially attuned. They're
sturdy and last forever (I write from my ancient Powerbook G4 that has
served me well for years and done field work in several countries). The
other especially neat thing about Macs is their ability to sync with
tablets - several people recommended this as a way to be even more
productive. One person even suggested using a tablet over a laptop!

Advice on citation programs was significantly less unanimous: Papers,
Zotero, and Mendeley all received several votes. Zotero might have more in
the way of community support, though, which will likely induce me to look
into it further. Papers costs money, but that comes with the assurance that
it will be updated as your device receives new builds. I've used Mendeley
to organize journal articles, but I'm told the citation requires more
manual editing than Zotero. It does work very smoothly over-all, though.

One last thing! A few different people also recommended having multiple
hard-drives, for both backing everything up and holding lots of data for
work like Arc-Gis.

Alright - I think I've summed it all up. Thanks again to everyone for all
their heart-felt advice!

Cheers,
Cat




* Over two dozen.

Reply via email to